Votación en el Parlamento Europeo
Estrategia europea de resiliencia hídrica
Resultado general
Aprobada- 470 A favor
- 81 En contra
- 92 Abstención
- 76 No votó
Cómo contamos
- Los votos A favor, En contra y Abstención provienen del acta de votación nominal del Parlamento Europeo.
- «No ha votado» se deriva: eurodiputados con mandato el día de la votación para los que no se registró ningún voto. Las abstenciones no cuentan para esto.
- Las correcciones de voto posteriores se muestran pero no cambian el resultado oficial.
- Cada votación (votación global, enmienda, votación parcial) cuenta por separado. Por eso los totales pueden diferir de páginas que cuentan de forma distinta.
Estado y procedimiento
Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.
- Votación celebrada el
- Último paso documentado
- Pleno · (hace 576 días)
- Próximo paso previsto
- La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Desarrollo del procedimiento
2024/2104(INI) · INI
Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.
- Documentado: Remisión
- Documentado: Examen en comisión
- Último documentado: Pleno
Actividades documentadas (17)
- Remisión a comisión
- Presentación del informe en comisión
- Presentación de la opinión en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
- Aprobación del informe en comisión
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
- Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:
Fuentes
Datos: EP Open Data API
¿De qué se trata?
- El PE pide objetivos de eficiencia hídrica e intensificar la adaptación al cambio climático
- Garantizar la financiación adecuada para las medidas esenciales de resiliencia hídrica
- Promover la digitalización y la innovación
Historial de enmiendas (12)
Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.
- Enmienda 2Aprobada
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Presentada por Thomas Bajada, Tiemo Wölken, Javi López +104 · Members
Añadido: 10a. Stresses that no one, whether in public places or private establishments, should be denied access to water supplied from a distribution network intended for human consumption, where available;
- Enmienda 4Aprobada
Paragraph 42
Presentada por Thomas Bajada, Peter Liese, Tiemo Wölken +101 · Members
42. Insists that essential uses of
Eliminado: PFAS, for example forAñadido: PFAS in critical sectors, such as medical devices, pharmaceuticals and products necessary for theEliminado: transition to climate neutrality, are not endangered;Añadido: twin transition to a climate neutral and digital economy, are not endangered in the context of upcoming legislative and non-legislative proposals; calls on the Commission to propose to phase out forever chemicals (PFAS)Eliminado: in consumer goods with proven concerns forAñadido: – starting with consumer goods – linked to harmful effects on human health and the environment,Eliminado: and onlyAñadido: based on scientific evidence, allowing their use where there areEliminado: safe alternatives;Añadido: no safe alternatives; underlines the need to scale up investments and accelerate the research and development of equivalent and safe alternatives; - Enmienda 4Aprobada
Paragraph 42
Presentada por Thomas Bajada, Peter Liese, Tiemo Wölken +101 · Members
42. Insists that essential uses of
Eliminado: PFAS, for example forAñadido: PFAS in critical sectors, such as medical devices, pharmaceuticals and products necessary for theEliminado: transition to climate neutrality, are not endangered;Añadido: twin transition to a climate neutral and digital economy, are not endangered in the context of upcoming legislative and non-legislative proposals; calls on the Commission to propose to phase out forever chemicals (PFAS)Eliminado: in consumer goods with proven concerns forAñadido: – starting with consumer goods – linked to harmful effects on human health and the environment,Eliminado: and onlyAñadido: based on scientific evidence, allowing their use where there areEliminado: safe alternatives;Añadido: no safe alternatives; underlines the need to scale up investments and accelerate the research and development of equivalent and safe alternatives; - Enmienda 5Rechazada
Recital R a (new)
Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members
Añadido: Ra. whereas agriculture is an essential sector in protecting the environment and ensuring the sustainability of ecosystems; whereas farmers play a fundamental role in sustainable water management by maintaining agricultural landscapes, preserving groundwater and actively helping to combat erosion and desertification; whereas farmers need to be supported in the transition to more resilient and water-efficient practices;
- Enmienda 6Rechazada
Recital AL a (new)
Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members
Añadido: ALa. whereas building dams and dykes and cleaning riverbeds are critical interventions in flood risk mitigation;
- Enmienda 7Rechazada
Paragraph 14
Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members
… covering all water uses, including industry, energy, agriculture, public institutions and households; Añadido: calls for further red tape and excessive regulatory burdens to be avoided; underlines the fact that these targets should be ambitious yet adaptable, taking …
- Enmienda 8Rechazada
Paragraph 21
Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members
… fertilisers efficiently, improve the hydrological cycle, enhance groundwater recharge and adapt to
Eliminado: lower water use; considers that technological solutions can also include measures that can increase water absorption, infiltration and retention in agricultural systems, which are important amid increasing occurrences of both drought and heavy rains;Añadido: efficient water use; recalls that the average share of water use for irrigation presents significant differences across Member States; stresses that a ‘one size fits all’ approach is not appropriate and would create unnecessary and unjustifiable bureaucratic constraints and red tape in certain regions; - Enmienda 9Rechazada
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members
Añadido: 25a. Underlines that the role of farmers in Europe as the main environmental protectors and guarantors of food sovereignty must be respected, and calls for the elimination of all restrictions on access to water resources that prevent them from carrying out their activities properly; deplores the fact that farmers are often accused of being the main cause of water management problems, whereas, in reality, they are the ones most affected by droughts and other extreme weather events; stresses that farmers should be considered not as consumers but as users of water that is displaced within the hydrological cycle; calls for a balanced approach, based on consultation between agricultural stakeholders, public authorities and civil society, to address water challenges in a fair and pragmatic manner;
- Enmienda 10Rechazada
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members
Añadido: 27a. Calls for an increase in water availability in water-stressed areas for all sectors at the local and regional level, ensuring that water basins are interconnected where possible and minimum river flows are respected;
- Enmienda 11Rechazada
Paragraph 55 a (new)
Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members
Añadido: 55a. Requests specific exemptions from the WFD and its ‘daughter’ directives (the Groundwater Directive and the Environmental Quality Standards Directive), as well as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the EU Nature Restoration Law1a, in order to allow, among other things, the construction of infrastructure, including that necessary to prevent floods, or the development of large housing projects to address the current housing crisis; stresses that the construction of this infrastructure would have prevented the disaster that occurred in Valencia in October 2024; _______________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024 on nature restoration and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869, OJ L, 2024/1991, 29.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1991/oj.
- Enmienda 12Rechazada
Paragraph 55 b (new)
Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members
Añadido: 55b. Is concerned about the fact that the outermost regions of the European Union face specific challenges in terms of water management, particularly due to the scarcity of water resources, the dilapidation of infrastructure and increased vulnerability to the effects of extreme weather events; urges the Commission and the Member States concerned to prioritise the funding of specific programmes for the renovation of the water infrastructure of the outermost regions, the creation of suitable water reserves, including desalination units, the reuse of treated wastewater, and the collection and storage of rainwater to guarantee equitable access to water;
- Enmienda 13Rechazada
Paragraph 62 a (new)
Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members
Añadido: 62a. Emphasises that controlling the flow of water and water storage for irrigation are the basis of all human activity as they play an essential role in ensuring access to water for people, meeting agricultural needs, and supporting electricity production; underlines that delays to and blocking of water irrigation and retention projects pose serious threats to food security and are detrimental to the general interest;
Voto por grupo político
Cómo votaron los grupos políticos
- 9A favor
- 4En contra
- 10Abstención
- 7No votó
- 30A favor
- 9En contra
- 1Abstención
- 6No votó
- 113A favor
- 0En contra
- 4Abstención
- 19No votó
- 166A favor
- 0En contra
- 2Abstención
- 20No votó
- 69A favor
- 0En contra
- 0Abstención
- 6No votó
- 36A favor
- 31En contra
- 16Abstención
- 2No votó
- 47A favor
- 5En contra
- 22Abstención
- 6No votó
- 0A favor
- 20En contra
- 2Abstención
- 4No votó
- 0A favor
- 12En contra
- 35Abstención
- 6No votó
Miembros
Mostrando 10 de 719
| Nombre | País | Grupo | Posición de voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor |