Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Estrategia europea de resiliencia hídrica

Thomas Bajada - Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 07.05.2025·Referencia: A10-0073/2025
Ponente: Thomas Bajada

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 470 A favor
  • 81 En contra
  • 92 Abstención
  • 76 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 576 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2024/2104(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión62 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión77 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno576 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (17)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Presentación de la opinión en comisión
  4. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  5. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  6. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  7. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  8. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  9. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  10. Presentación al pleno
  11. Presentación al pleno
  12. Presentación al pleno
  13. Presentación al pleno
  14. Presentación al pleno
  15. Debate en el pleno
  16. Votación en el pleno
  17. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Debate en el pleno
  2. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • El PE pide objetivos de eficiencia hídrica e intensificar la adaptación al cambio climático
  • Garantizar la financiación adecuada para las medidas esenciales de resiliencia hídrica
  • Promover la digitalización y la innovación
Fuente: EP Press Room — 7 de mayo de 2025

Historial de enmiendas (12)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 2Aprobada

    Paragraph 10 a (new)

    Presentada por Thomas Bajada, Tiemo Wölken, Javi López +104 · Members

    Añadido: 10a. Stresses that no one, whether in public places or private establishments, should be denied access to water supplied from a distribution network intended for human consumption, where available;

  2. Enmienda 4Aprobada

    Paragraph 42

    Presentada por Thomas Bajada, Peter Liese, Tiemo Wölken +101 · Members

    42. Insists that essential uses of Eliminado: PFAS, for example for Añadido: PFAS in critical sectors, such as medical devices, pharmaceuticals and products necessary for the Eliminado: transition to climate neutrality, are not endangered; Añadido: twin transition to a climate neutral and digital economy, are not endangered in the context of upcoming legislative and non-legislative proposals; calls on the Commission to propose to phase out forever chemicals (PFAS) Eliminado: in consumer goods with proven concerns for Añadido: – starting with consumer goods – linked to harmful effects on human health and the environment, Eliminado: and only Añadido: based on scientific evidence, allowing their use where there are Eliminado: safe alternatives; Añadido: no safe alternatives; underlines the need to scale up investments and accelerate the research and development of equivalent and safe alternatives;

  3. Enmienda 4Aprobada

    Paragraph 42

    Presentada por Thomas Bajada, Peter Liese, Tiemo Wölken +101 · Members

    42. Insists that essential uses of Eliminado: PFAS, for example for Añadido: PFAS in critical sectors, such as medical devices, pharmaceuticals and products necessary for the Eliminado: transition to climate neutrality, are not endangered; Añadido: twin transition to a climate neutral and digital economy, are not endangered in the context of upcoming legislative and non-legislative proposals; calls on the Commission to propose to phase out forever chemicals (PFAS) Eliminado: in consumer goods with proven concerns for Añadido: – starting with consumer goods – linked to harmful effects on human health and the environment, Eliminado: and only Añadido: based on scientific evidence, allowing their use where there are Eliminado: safe alternatives; Añadido: no safe alternatives; underlines the need to scale up investments and accelerate the research and development of equivalent and safe alternatives;

  4. Enmienda 5Rechazada

    Recital R a (new)

    Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Añadido: Ra. whereas agriculture is an essential sector in protecting the environment and ensuring the sustainability of ecosystems; whereas farmers play a fundamental role in sustainable water management by maintaining agricultural landscapes, preserving groundwater and actively helping to combat erosion and desertification; whereas farmers need to be supported in the transition to more resilient and water-efficient practices;

  5. Enmienda 6Rechazada

    Recital AL a (new)

    Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Añadido: ALa. whereas building dams and dykes and cleaning riverbeds are critical interventions in flood risk mitigation;

  6. Enmienda 7Rechazada

    Paragraph 14

    Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    … covering all water uses, including industry, energy, agriculture, public institutions and households; Añadido: calls for further red tape and excessive regulatory burdens to be avoided; underlines the fact that these targets should be ambitious yet adaptable, taking …

  7. Enmienda 8Rechazada

    Paragraph 21

    Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    … fertilisers efficiently, improve the hydrological cycle, enhance groundwater recharge and adapt to Eliminado: lower water use; considers that technological solutions can also include measures that can increase water absorption, infiltration and retention in agricultural systems, which are important amid increasing occurrences of both drought and heavy rains; Añadido: efficient water use; recalls that the average share of water use for irrigation presents significant differences across Member States; stresses that a ‘one size fits all’ approach is not appropriate and would create unnecessary and unjustifiable bureaucratic constraints and red tape in certain regions;

  8. Enmienda 9Rechazada

    Paragraph 25 a (new)

    Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Añadido: 25a. Underlines that the role of farmers in Europe as the main environmental protectors and guarantors of food sovereignty must be respected, and calls for the elimination of all restrictions on access to water resources that prevent them from carrying out their activities properly; deplores the fact that farmers are often accused of being the main cause of water management problems, whereas, in reality, they are the ones most affected by droughts and other extreme weather events; stresses that farmers should be considered not as consumers but as users of water that is displaced within the hydrological cycle; calls for a balanced approach, based on consultation between agricultural stakeholders, public authorities and civil society, to address water challenges in a fair and pragmatic manner;

  9. Enmienda 10Rechazada

    Paragraph 27 a (new)

    Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Añadido: 27a. Calls for an increase in water availability in water-stressed areas for all sectors at the local and regional level, ensuring that water basins are interconnected where possible and minimum river flows are respected;

  10. Enmienda 11Rechazada

    Paragraph 55 a (new)

    Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Añadido: 55a. Requests specific exemptions from the WFD and its ‘daughter’ directives (the Groundwater Directive and the Environmental Quality Standards Directive), as well as the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the EU Nature Restoration Law1a, in order to allow, among other things, the construction of infrastructure, including that necessary to prevent floods, or the development of large housing projects to address the current housing crisis; stresses that the construction of this infrastructure would have prevented the disaster that occurred in Valencia in October 2024; _______________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024 on nature restoration and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869, OJ L, 2024/1991, 29.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1991/oj.

  11. Enmienda 12Rechazada

    Paragraph 55 b (new)

    Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Añadido: 55b. Is concerned about the fact that the outermost regions of the European Union face specific challenges in terms of water management, particularly due to the scarcity of water resources, the dilapidation of infrastructure and increased vulnerability to the effects of extreme weather events; urges the Commission and the Member States concerned to prioritise the funding of specific programmes for the renovation of the water infrastructure of the outermost regions, the creation of suitable water reserves, including desalination units, the reuse of treated wastewater, and the collection and storage of rainwater to guarantee equitable access to water;

  12. Enmienda 13Rechazada

    Paragraph 62 a (new)

    Presentada por Tamás Deutsch, Csaba Dömötör, Viktória Ferenc +72 · Members

    Añadido: 62a. Emphasises that controlling the flow of water and water storage for irrigation are the basis of all human activity as they play an essential role in ensuring access to water for people, meeting agricultural needs, and supporting electricity production; underlines that delays to and blocking of water irrigation and retention projects pose serious threats to food security and are detrimental to the general interest;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
AlemaniaGUE/NGL
A favor
MaltaS&D
A favor
EsloveniaEPP
A favor
EspañaEPP
A favor
BélgicaRenew
A favor
GreciaEPP
A favor
LetoniaEPP
A favor
EspañaEPP
A favor
BélgicaS&D
A favor
EspañaS&D
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en