Prevención de las pérdidas de granza de plástico para reducir la contaminación por microplásticos

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

1. Enmienda 95Rechazada

   Article 16 – paragraph 4

   Presentada por Deirdre Clune · PPE

   Eliminado: 4. Where theclaim for compensation referred to in paragraph 1 is supported by evidence from which a causal link may be presumed between the damage and the infringement, Member States shall ensure that the onus is on the person responsible for the infringement to prove that the infringement did not cause or contribute to the damage. Añadido: deleted

2. Enmienda 96Rechazada

   Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b

   Presentada por Idoia Villanueva Ruiz · The Left

   (b) take Eliminado: measures to limit Añadido: remedial measures to mitigate the negative impacts of the health or environmental Eliminado: consequences Añadido: consequences, to restore and rehabilitate or replace damaged natural resources and to prevent further incidents or accidents.

3. Enmienda 96Rechazada

   Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b

   Presentada por Idoia Villanueva Ruiz · The Left

   (b) take Eliminado: measures to limit Añadido: remedial measures to mitigate the negative impacts of the health or environmental Eliminado: consequences Añadido: consequences, to restore and rehabilitate or replace damaged natural resources and to prevent further incidents or accidents.

4. Enmienda 97Rechazada

   Recital 15 a (new)

   Presentada por Catherine Griset, Anders Vistisen · ID

   Añadido: (15 a) The most efficient way of combatting microplastic pollution is to tackle it directly at its source, using preventive measures. Therefore, it is crucial to minimize the administrative and financial burden on businesses, particularly micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises, to ensure it does not hinder their ability to effectively reduce microplastic pollution in the environment.