Vote in the European Parliament
Psychosocial risks, stress and mental health at work
Overall Result
Adopted- 413 For
- 210 Against
- 29 Abstention
- 66 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (67 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2026/2023(INL) · INL
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (15)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
Amendment history (5)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 2Rejected
Recital AJ
Tabled by Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Séverine Werbrouck, Marie Dauchy +1 · PfE
AJ. whereas Added: employers are responsible for preventing work-related psychosocial risks
Removed: are the responsibility of the employer and must be addressed primarily through collective and organisational prevention measures;Added: arising from working conditions within their control; whereas effective prevention also requires responsible conduct by all actors in the workplace, in accordance with their respective responsibilities; - Amendment 4Rejected
Paragraph 12
Tabled by Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Séverine Werbrouck, Marie Dauchy +1 · PfE
12. Recalls the need
Removed: to move towards a zero-tolerance approachAdded: for a zero tolerance approach towards physical and verbal violence at work; stresses in particular the exposure of healthcare professionals, teachers, emergency service workers, law-enforcement officers and other workers in direct contact with the public to violence andRemoved: harassment at work and encouragesAdded: aggression by third parties; calls on Member States toRemoved: ratify relevant international instruments, in particular the Violence and Harassment Convention, 2019 (No. 190) of the International Labour Organization; underlines the importance of clear, confidential, independent and accessible procedures to address cases of harassment, violence and discrimination at work, including cases involving abuse by colleagues, supervisors or management, ensuring protection against adverse treatment and respect for victims’ rights;Added: ensure effective prevention, reporting and protection mechanisms adapted to national and sectoral circumstances; - Amendment 5Rejected
Paragraph 13
Tabled by Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Séverine Werbrouck, Marie Dauchy +1 · PfE
13.
Removed: Calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen labour inspectorates through a proposal for a Council Recommendation on EU-wide minimum standards, including through enhanced cooperation andAdded: Recognises the essential role of national labour inspectorates and encourages voluntary cooperation and the exchange of best practicesRemoved: and taking into account the realities of SMEs in the field of work-related psychosocial risks, including specialised training, harmonised assessment and monitoring tools, and adequate resources to support effective prevention and enforcement, and thereby strengthening national inspectorates based on those standards; reiterates its call on the Commission to substantially strengthenAdded: between national authorities; stresses that their organisation, powers and resources should remain a responsibility of the Member States; recalls that such cooperation should neither lead to the harmonisation of national labour inspection systems nor to the transfer of additional supervisory or enforcement powers to the European LabourRemoved: Authority’s (ELA) mandate21 ; considers that a strengthened ELA mandate would improve the enforcement of EU labour law and occupational health and safety, and enhance the collection and dissemination of best practices of national labour inspectorates, and should also allow for the issuing of recommendations based on these learnings; 21 European Parliament resolution of 18 January 2024 on the revision of the European Labour Authority mandate (2023/2866(RSP)).Added: Authority; - Amendment 6Rejected
Paragraph 17
Tabled by Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Séverine Werbrouck, Marie Dauchy +1 · PfE
17. Stresses the
Removed: need for minimum standards in the recognition, prevention and compensation ofAdded: importance of preventing work-related psychosocial risks,Removed: in order to avoid legal fragmentation and ensure equal protection of workers; calls on the Commission to propose a clear and legally binding definition of work-related psychosocial risks and psychosocial risk factors, covering risks arising from work organisation, design and management practices comprising those related to digital surveillanceAdded: including those associated with the use of digital and algorithmic managementRemoved: at the workplace, the social and relational context at work and working conditions, heat and extreme weather, affecting both physical and mental health, with particular impact on emergency responders and including issues such as work-related stress, mobbing burnout, harassment, violence and discrimination; underlines that such standards must be workable and easily implementable for companies of all sizes, with tailored and dedicated support for SMEs (e.g. simplified digital risk assessment tools, sectorial guidance, targeted financial or advisory assistance); stresses that such tailored support can help SMEs embed effective and sustainable psychosocial risk prevention in their daily operations while remaining fully aligned with the Union’s ambition to promote safe, healthy and productive workplaces; calls furthermore for algorithmic management systems and technologies to be better integrated into health and safety systems at workplaces, with the involvement of worker representatives;Added: tools; considers that Member States and social partners are best placed to determine appropriate measures in accordance with national circumstances; stresses that action at European level should respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and avoid disproportionate burdens, in particular on SMEs and micro-enterprises; - Amendment 7Rejected
Paragraph 18
Tabled by Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Séverine Werbrouck, Marie Dauchy +1 · PfE
18.
Removed: Requests the Commission to carry out an impact assessment including an assessment of existing legislation complemented by a competitiveness and SME test and to submit, on the basis of Article 153(2), point (b), and Article 153(1), point (a), of the TFEU and the result of the aforementioned steps, a legislative proposal on work-related psychosocial risks, stress and mental health at work which would address the remaining gaps in existing legislation and avoid creation of overlapping legal instruments, with view to an equivalent, high level of protection for all workers in the Union following the recommendations set out in the Annex hereto;Added: Considers that priority should be given to the effective implementation and enforcement of the existing Union occupational safety and health framework; considers that additional Union legislation should only be envisaged where clear regulatory gaps cannot be effectively addressed by Member States, in full respect of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and without imposing disproportionate administrative or financial burdens, in particular on SMEs and micro-enterprises;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 55For
- 17Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 123For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 42For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 130For
- 38Against
- 1Abstention
- 15Did not vote
- 49For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 14For
- 8Against
- 2Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 0For
- 66Against
- 6Abstention
- 12Did not vote
- 0For
- 57Against
- 19Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 0For
- 24Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |