Vote in the European Parliament

Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield

Tomas Tobé – After § 132 – Am 72
Date: 15.09.2026·Reference: A10-0199/2026
Rapporteur: Tomas Tobé

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 177 For
  • 456 Against
  • 22 Abstention
  • 62 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 72 · Tabled by ECRView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Beata Szydło, Mariusz Kamiński

Added: 132a. Stresses that the credibility of the EU’s efforts to counter foreign interference, corruption and malign influence depends first and foremost on its willingness to address vulnerabilities within its own institutions with the same determination and transparency that it expects from the Member States; recalls that foreign interference does not operate solely through disinformation campaigns, cyberattacks or external influence operations, but may also exploit corruption, bribery, conflicts of interest, opaque lobbying, revolving-door practices, inadequate scrutiny of external contacts and weaknesses in the control of EU funding; recalls, in this regard, the serious institutional vulnerabilities exposed by the ‘Qatargate’ corruption scandal, which demonstrated the capacity of third-country interests to seek influence within Parliament through financial inducements, intermediaries and covert networks; further recalls the conviction of former MEPs for accepting bribes in return for activities promoting pro-Russian interests, including parliamentary interventions, which constitutes a particularly serious example of foreign financial influence reaching directly into parliamentary activity; considers that such cases must be treated not merely as individual instances of misconduct but as warnings concerning the resilience, integrity and security of the EU’s own democratic institutions; draws particular attention, in this context, to the money-laundering charges brought against former EU Commissioner for Justice, Didier Reynders, and to reports of his close contacts with Russian nationals, including a sanctioned oligarch close to Putin, at a time when the Commissioner was also responsible for the implementation of sanctions; calls on the Commission to cooperate with the relevant authorities and services and to take its own steps to clarify how the allegations against Commissioner Reynders may have affected the exercise of his duties, including whether they undermined the EU’s policy towards Russia and whether they contributed to unjustified attacks against Poland, a frontline Member State and a key country in supporting Ukraine; strongly condemns revolving-door practices whereby former senior political office-holders assume remunerated positions or advisory roles in state-controlled companies or structures linked to authoritarian third countries, as illustrated by the involvement of former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder with the Russian energy sector; stresses that such relationships may create dependencies, conflicts of interest and opportunities for foreign leverage and may severely damage public confidence in European decision-making;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE788.231

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (80 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2069(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral259 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage250 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary80 days since this step began
Recorded activities (27)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee amendments tabled
  6. Committee amendments tabled
  7. Committee amendments tabled
  8. Committee amendments tabled
  9. Committee report adopted
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Tabling for plenary
  17. Tabling for plenary
  18. Tabling for plenary
  19. Tabling for plenary
  20. Tabling for plenary
  21. Tabling for plenary
  22. Tabling for plenary
  23. Tabling for plenary
  24. Tabling for plenary
  25. Plenary debate
  26. Plenary vote
  27. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 717

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
PolandECR
For
PolandECR
For
FrancePfE
For
BelgiumPfE
For
CzechiaPfE
For
NetherlandsECR
For
RomaniaECR
For
CzechiaEPP
For
ItalyECR
For
RomaniaNI
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en