Vote in the European Parliament

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – Recital F – Am 3
Date: 20.05.2026·Reference: A10-0120/2026
Rapporteur: Stéphanie Yon-Courtin

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 198 For
  • 440 Against
  • 7 Abstention
  • 72 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 3 · Tabled by ESNView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Sarah Knafo

… measures in at least 20 % of its sea area by 2030; Added: whereas the implementation of these measures must respect the principle of proportionality and not compromise food sovereignty, coastal employment and traditional fishing activities;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.279

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (204 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2126(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral327 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage128 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary204 days since this step began
Recorded activities (11)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Plenary debate
  10. Plenary vote
  11. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Uneven implementation of maritime spatial planning in the EU.
  • Fisheries and aquaculture threatened by spatial competition and restrictions .
  • Call for binding fishing zones and improved data basis.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 717

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
CzechiaECR
For
ItalyECR
For
FrancePfE
For
SwedenECR
For
FrancePfE
For
NetherlandsPfE
For
CzechiaPfE
For
SpainPfE
For
FrancePfE
For
LatviaECR
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en