Vote in the European Parliament
The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins
Overall Result
Adopted- 518 For
- 31 Against
- 102 Abstention
- 66 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (204 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2024/2126(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Uneven implementation of maritime spatial planning in the EU.
- Fisheries and aquaculture threatened by spatial competition and restrictions .
- Call for binding fishing zones and improved data basis.
Amendment history (7)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Recital C a (new)
Tabled by France Jamet, António Tânger Corrêa, Ton Diepeveen · PfE
Added: Ca. whereas the EU still accounts for less than 1 % of global aquaculture production and bears a considerable administrative burden, with the aquaculture sector experiencing a 22 % decrease in return on investment between 2017 and 2022;
- Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 31
Tabled by France Jamet, António Tânger Corrêa, Ton Diepeveen · PfE
… Emphasises that fisheries and aquaculture are often overshadowed by other, more powerful Added: state-backed or economically important sectors, such as offshore
Removed: energy;Added: energy, especially wind farms; recalls that the vast majority of offshore energy infrastructure has significant disadvantages and does not compensate for the damage caused to fisheries and food sovereignty; takes note of reports of structural power imbalances between maritime sectors; deplores … - Amendment 3Rejected
Recital F
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
… measures in at least 20 % of its sea area by 2030; Added: whereas the implementation of these measures must respect the principle of proportionality and not compromise food sovereignty, coastal employment and traditional fishing activities;
- Amendment 4Rejected
Paragraph 16
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
… whenever possible, be placed in zones that are less suitable for fishing, Added: and should not be authorised where they would threaten the economic viability of traditional fishing communities, in order to minimise negative impacts on fisheries operations;
- Amendment 5Rejected
Paragraph 41
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
… indicators, in order to bring greater visibility and predictability to the fisheries
Removed: sector;Added: sector, a sector that should not be reduced by the deployment of offshore renewable infrastructure; calls for mandatory assessment of the cumulative socio-economic impacts of fishing displacement, … - Amendment 6Rejected
Paragraph 69
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
… legislation and regulatory framework, by streamlining overlapping regulations, aligning objectives, streamlining existing
Removed: targets and introducing minimum targets to be reached in maritime spatial plans,Added: targets, improving coherence between marine and terrestrial spatial planning, and establishing shared governance … provisions on the participation of stakeholders, especially fishers and coastal communities, legallyRemoved: binding, with more harmonised application by all Member States;Added: binding; believes that the proposed act should create synergy among the different regulations … - Amendment 7Rejected
Paragraph 42 a (new)
Tabled by Emma Fourreau, Luke Ming Flanagan · The Left
Added: 42a. Calls for the EU and its Member States to prohibit fishing vessels over 25 metres in length from fishing within EU waters up to 12 nautical miles from the baselines in order to safeguard coastal fishing communities and conserve marine biological resources and ecosystems;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 68For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 156For
- 2Against
- 1Abstention
- 24Did not vote
- 78For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 24For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 99For
- 14Against
- 9Abstention
- 14Did not vote
- 76For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 13For
- 3Against
- 10Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 2For
- 11Against
- 30Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 2For
- 1Against
- 46Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 717
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |