Vote in the European Parliament

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 20.05.2026·Reference: A10-0120/2026
Rapporteur: Stéphanie Yon-Courtin

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 518 For
  • 31 Against
  • 102 Abstention
  • 66 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (204 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2126(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral327 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage128 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary204 days since this step began
Recorded activities (11)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Plenary debate
  10. Plenary vote
  11. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Uneven implementation of maritime spatial planning in the EU.
  • Fisheries and aquaculture threatened by spatial competition and restrictions .
  • Call for binding fishing zones and improved data basis.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (7)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Recital C a (new)

    Tabled by France Jamet, António Tânger Corrêa, Ton Diepeveen · PfE

    Added: Ca. whereas the EU still accounts for less than 1 % of global aquaculture production and bears a considerable administrative burden, with the aquaculture sector experiencing a 22 % decrease in return on investment between 2017 and 2022;

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Paragraph 31

    Tabled by France Jamet, António Tânger Corrêa, Ton Diepeveen · PfE

    … Emphasises that fisheries and aquaculture are often overshadowed by other, more powerful Added: state-backed or economically important sectors, such as offshore Removed: energy; Added: energy, especially wind farms; recalls that the vast majority of offshore energy infrastructure has significant disadvantages and does not compensate for the damage caused to fisheries and food sovereignty; takes note of reports of structural power imbalances between maritime sectors; deplores …

  3. Amendment 3Rejected

    Recital F

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN

    … measures in at least 20 % of its sea area by 2030; Added: whereas the implementation of these measures must respect the principle of proportionality and not compromise food sovereignty, coastal employment and traditional fishing activities;

  4. Amendment 4Rejected

    Paragraph 16

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN

    … whenever possible, be placed in zones that are less suitable for fishing, Added: and should not be authorised where they would threaten the economic viability of traditional fishing communities, in order to minimise negative impacts on fisheries operations;

  5. Amendment 5Rejected

    Paragraph 41

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN

    … indicators, in order to bring greater visibility and predictability to the fisheries Removed: sector; Added: sector, a sector that should not be reduced by the deployment of offshore renewable infrastructure; calls for mandatory assessment of the cumulative socio-economic impacts of fishing displacement, …

  6. Amendment 6Rejected

    Paragraph 69

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN

    … legislation and regulatory framework, by streamlining overlapping regulations, aligning objectives, streamlining existing Removed: targets and introducing minimum targets to be reached in maritime spatial plans, Added: targets, improving coherence between marine and terrestrial spatial planning, and establishing shared governance … provisions on the participation of stakeholders, especially fishers and coastal communities, legally Removed: binding, with more harmonised application by all Member States; Added: binding; believes that the proposed act should create synergy among the different regulations …

  7. Amendment 7Rejected

    Paragraph 42 a (new)

    Tabled by Emma Fourreau, Luke Ming Flanagan · The Left

    Added: 42a. Calls for the EU and its Member States to prohibit fishing vessels over 25 metres in length from fishing within EU waters up to 12 nautical miles from the baselines in order to safeguard coastal fishing communities and conserve marine biological resources and ecosystems;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 717

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
PortugalEPP
For
CzechiaPfE
For
FrancePfE
For
BelgiumRenew
For
RomaniaRenew
For
GreecePfE
For
BulgariaEPP
For
NetherlandsPfE
For
GermanyESN
For
FranceRenew
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en