Vote in the European Parliament
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Date: 11.02.2026Reference: B10-0107/2026Overall Result
Adopted- 461 For
- 169 Against
- 22 Abstention
- 67 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (275 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2026/2523(RSP) · RSP
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (2)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The approval of genetically modified soybean variety DBN-09004-6 for the EU market is under scrutiny due to its resistance to glufosinate and glyphosate, herbicides with contested health and environmental risks.
- Concerns include the lack of long-term studies on toxicological effects and pesticide residue interactions.
- Such herbicide-resistant crops may increase pesticide use, harm biodiversity, and create competitive disadvantages for EU farmers.
- The resolution calls for applying the precautionary principle and reforming GMO authorization procedures.
- It also highlights democratic deficits in current decision-making processes.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For29
- 29For
- 1Against
- 1Abstention
- 1Did not vote
For117
- 117For
- 0Against
- 5Abstention
- 14Did not vote
For61
- 61For
- 11Against
- 2Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For37
- 37For
- 0Against
- 8Abstention
- 8Did not vote
For42
- 42For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
For54
- 54For
- 111Against
- 5Abstention
- 17Did not vote
For62
- 62For
- 12Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
For33
- 33For
- 34Against
- 1Abstention
- 7Did not vote
For26
- 26For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 1Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |