Vote in the European Parliament

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

David McAllister – § 91 – Am 41D
Date: 21.01.2026·Reference: A10-0253/2025
Rapporteur: David McAllister

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 278 For
  • 368 Against
  • 12 Abstention
  • 61 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 41 · Tabled by The LeftView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Lynn Boylan, Kathleen Funchion

Removed: 91. Reiterates its call for the Council to gradually transition to qualified majority voting for decisions in areas of the CFSP that do not have military or defence implications, specifically in the context of our sanctions regime; acknowledges the concerns of some Member States regarding a perceived reduction in their influence over foreign and security policy at EU level; recalls that the VP/HR is tasked, as set out in her mission letter, with triggering the use of Treaty provisions enabling qualified majority voting for the CFSP and, accordingly, expects the VP/HR to engage in constructive dialogue with the Member States to that end; encourages the full use of all possibilities that currently exist to enhance decisiveness in this regard and calls on the Member States to make greater and more transparent use of constructive abstention in line with Article 31(1) TEU in cases where they cannot endorse a decision but do not wish to block the Union’s collective action; stresses that this approach strengthens the EU’s ability to respond swiftly and coherently to international crises, while respecting national sovereignty, and demonstrates that greater effectiveness in the CFSP is already possible without a Treaty change; recognises that progress towards the application of qualified majority voting can only be gradual, building on the formation of a European strategic culture; Added: deleted

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE782.019v01-00

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (331 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2164(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage1 day until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral20 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage77 days until the next step
  4. Latest recorded: Plenary331 days since this step began
Recorded activities (29)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee amendments tabled
  6. Committee report adopted
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Tabling for plenary
  17. Tabling for plenary
  18. Tabling for plenary
  19. Tabling for plenary
  20. Tabling for plenary
  21. Tabling for plenary
  22. Tabling for plenary
  23. Tabling for plenary
  24. Tabling for plenary
  25. Tabling for plenary
  26. Tabling for plenary
  27. Plenary debate
  28. Plenary vote
  29. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • The report assesses the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) implementation in 2025, emphasizing the defense of the rules-based international order against authoritarian threats.
  • Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine is condemned as a grave violation of international law and European security.
  • The EU is urged to enhance support for Ukraine, including military aid and long-term security guarantees, to achieve a just peace.
  • Strengthening European defense capabilities and countering hybrid threats like disinformation and sabotage are prioritized.
  • The report also calls for expanding geopolitical partnerships, such as with Latin America and Central Asia, to bolster global stability and EU interests.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
ItalyPfE
For
ItalyPfE
For
MaltaS&D
For
CzechiaNI
For
CroatiaEPP
For
CyprusNI
For
GermanyNI
For
BulgariaECR
For
PolandEPP
For
FrancePfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en