EN

Vote in the European Parliament

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

David McAllister – After § 78 – Am 37
Date: 21.01.2026·Reference: A10-0253/2025
Rapporteur: David McAllister
international securitystrategic partnership (EU)transatlantic relationsPalestine questionthe EU's international roleinternational cooperationcommon foreign and security policyactivity reportmultilateral relationsRusso-Ukrainian issue

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 253 For
  • 361 Against
  • 49 Abstention
  • 56 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 37 · Tabled by The LeftView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Manon Aubry, Emma Fourreau, Anthony Smith, Marina Mesure, Per Clausen, Irene Montero, Isabel Serra Sánchez, Danilo Della Valle, Rima Hassan, Arash Saeidi, Leila Chaibi, Damien Carême, Estrella Galán

Added: 78c. Underlines that the EU cannot accept extortive policies; stresses that threats made by the US administration against Greenland and Denmark, in addition to those made in relation to the EU’s digital legislation, fall under the definition of ‘economic coercion’ as set out in Regulation 2023/26751a; calls therefore for the Commission to immediately react by triggering the Anti-Coercion Instrument1b; ______________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2023/2675 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 November 2023 on the protection of the Union and its Member States from economic coercion by third countries (OJ L, 2023/2675, 7.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2675/oj). 1b Regulation (EU) 2023/2675 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 November 2023 on the protection of the Union and its Member States from economic coercion by third countries (OJ L, 2023/2675, 7.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2675/oj).

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE782.019v01-00

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (331 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2164(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage1 day until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral20 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage77 days until the next step
  4. Latest recorded: Plenary331 days since this step began
Recorded activities (29)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee amendments tabled
  6. Committee report adopted
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Tabling for plenary
  17. Tabling for plenary
  18. Tabling for plenary
  19. Tabling for plenary
  20. Tabling for plenary
  21. Tabling for plenary
  22. Tabling for plenary
  23. Tabling for plenary
  24. Tabling for plenary
  25. Tabling for plenary
  26. Tabling for plenary
  27. Plenary debate
  28. Plenary vote
  29. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Roll-call minutesParliament documentProcedure file (OEIL)

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • The report assesses the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) implementation in 2025, emphasizing the defense of the rules-based international order against authoritarian threats.
  • Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine is condemned as a grave violation of international law and European security.
  • The EU is urged to enhance support for Ukraine, including military aid and long-term security guarantees, to achieve a just peace.
  • Strengthening European defense capabilities and countering hybrid threats like disinformation and sabotage are prioritized.
  • The report also calls for expanding geopolitical partnerships, such as with Latin America and Central Asia, to bolster global stability and EU interests.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Non-attached Members (NI)
For14
  • 14For
  • 6Against
  • 6Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)
For40
  • 40For
  • 0Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 6Did not vote
View details
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
For51
  • 51For
  • 0Against
  • 1Abstention
  • 1Did not vote
View details
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
For110
  • 110For
  • 0Against
  • 15Abstention
  • 11Did not vote
View details
Patriots for Europe (PfE)
For30
  • 30For
  • 38Against
  • 12Abstention
  • 6Did not vote
View details
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)
For2
  • 2For
  • 18Against
  • 5Abstention
  • 2Did not vote
View details
Renew Europe (Renew)
For6
  • 6For
  • 56Against
  • 7Abstention
  • 6Did not vote
View details
European People's Party (EPP)
For0
  • 0For
  • 172Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 15Did not vote
View details
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
For0
  • 0For
  • 71Against
  • 3Abstention
  • 5Did not vote
View details

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
Irene MonteroIrene Montero
SpainGUE/NGL
For
Kai TegethoffKai Tegethoff
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
Claire FitaClaire Fita
FranceS&D
For
Rody TolassyRody Tolassy
FrancePfE
For
Julien LeonardelliJulien Leonardelli
FrancePfE
For
Valentina PalmisanoValentina Palmisano
ItalyGUE/NGL
For
Jean-Marc GermainJean-Marc Germain
FranceS&D
For
France JametFrance Jamet
FrancePfE
For
Virginijus SinkevičiusVirginijus Sinkevičius
LithuaniaGreens/EFA
For
Markéta GregorováMarkéta Gregorová
CzechiaGreens/EFA
For
Show more
← Go back
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en