EN
Español
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises
Leire Pajín – § 10/2
Date: 20.01.2026Reference: A10-0257/2025peacekeepingEU aidfinancing of aidwomen's rightshumanitarian aidinternational humanitarian lawmultilateral relationshuman rightshumanitarian crisisdevelopment aidthe EU's international rolecrisis management
Overall Result
Adopted- 325 For
- 290 Against
- 31 Abstention
- 73 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (326 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2085(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (12)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The EU aims to enhance its humanitarian response to address global multi-crises, including conflicts, climate change, and funding shortages.
- Key objectives include reinforcing humanitarian principles, protecting civilians, and ensuring unimpeded access to aid.
- Special emphasis is placed on combating gender inequalities and supporting vulnerable groups such as women, children, and persons with disabilities.
- Funding is to be increased through innovative partnerships and improved coordination with local actors.
- Politically, the EU seeks to solidify its role as a leading donor through diplomatic efforts and adherence to international humanitarian law.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For18
- 18For
- 5Against
- 3Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For122
- 122For
- 1Against
- 1Abstention
- 12Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For43
- 43For
- 105Against
- 20Abstention
- 20Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For52
- 52For
- 12Against
- 2Abstention
- 9Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For38
- 38For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For51
- 51For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For1
- 1For
- 20Against
- 3Abstention
- 3Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For0
- 0For
- 68Against
- 2Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For0
- 0For
- 79Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Poland | S&D | For | |
 Belgium | EPP | For | |
 Ireland | Renew | For | |
 Slovakia | NI | For | |
 Italy | S&D | For | |
| Poland | EPP | For | |
 Germany | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Netherlands | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Romania | S&D | For | |
 Croatia | S&D | For |
