EN
Español
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises
Leire Pajín – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 20.01.2026Reference: A10-0257/2025peacekeepingEU aidfinancing of aidwomen's rightshumanitarian aidinternational humanitarian lawmultilateral relationshuman rightshumanitarian crisisdevelopment aidthe EU's international rolecrisis management
Overall Result
Adopted- 444 For
- 153 Against
- 55 Abstention
- 67 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (326 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2085(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (12)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The EU aims to enhance its humanitarian response to address global multi-crises, including conflicts, climate change, and funding shortages.
- Key objectives include reinforcing humanitarian principles, protecting civilians, and ensuring unimpeded access to aid.
- Special emphasis is placed on combating gender inequalities and supporting vulnerable groups such as women, children, and persons with disabilities.
- Funding is to be increased through innovative partnerships and improved coordination with local actors.
- Politically, the EU seeks to solidify its role as a leading donor through diplomatic efforts and adherence to international humanitarian law.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For18
- 18For
- 3Against
- 5Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For127
- 127For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For147
- 147For
- 7Against
- 18Abstention
- 16Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For66
- 66For
- 2Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For37
- 37For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For49
- 49For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For0
- 0For
- 68Against
- 3Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For0
- 0For
- 23Against
- 1Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For0
- 0For
- 50Against
- 28Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Ireland | S&D | For | |
 Germany | S&D | For | |
 Croatia | S&D | For | |
 Poland | EPP | For | |
 Netherlands | Renew | For | |
| Germany | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Italy | S&D | For | |
| Germany | S&D | For | |
 Romania | EPP | For | |
| Germany | Renew | For |
