EN

Vote in the European Parliament

Implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products

Gabriel Mato – Article 4 – after § 3 – Am 42
Date: 16.12.2025·Reference: A10-0254/2025
Rapporteur: Gabriel Mato
protective clauseagricultural tradecooperation policyinterim agreement (EU)trade agreementcooperation agreement (EU)tariff policytrade agreement (EU)trade policyMercosur

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 195 For
  • 432 Against
  • 18 Abstention
  • 74 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 42 · Tabled by PfEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Enikő Győri, Christophe Bay, Thierry Mariani, Isabella Tovaglieri, Anna Bryłka, Nikola Bartůšek

Added: 3 b. Where an increase in imports causes or threatens to cause serious injury or the risk thereof to a sector in one or more Member States, the Commission may initiate the application of a safeguard measure on the products concerned, even if the 5 % increase threshold is not met at Union level, provided that clear evidence demonstrates significant adverse effects at Member State or regional market level.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE779.036

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (239 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0322(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage4 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral3 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage12 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Plenary7 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Negotiations42 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Committee stage7 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Plenary36 days until the next step
  8. Recorded: Signature8 days until the next step
  9. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (38)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Tabling for plenary
  17. Tabling for plenary
  18. Tabling for plenary
  19. Tabling for plenary
  20. Text amended in plenary
  21. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  22. Plenary vote
  23. Plenary vote results
  24. Interinstitutional negotiations
  25. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  26. Tabling for plenary
  27. Tabling for plenary
  28. Tabling for plenary
  29. Tabling for plenary
  30. Tabling for plenary
  31. Tabling for plenary
  32. Tabling for plenary
  33. Tabling for plenary
  34. Parliament’s first-reading position
  35. Plenary vote
  36. Plenary vote results
  37. Signature
  38. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Roll-call minutesParliament documentProcedure file (OEIL)

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • This regulation establishes a bilateral safeguard clause for agricultural products under the EU-MERCOSUR agreement.
  • Its aim is to protect sensitive agricultural sectors from market disruptions caused by increased imports from Mercosur countries.
  • The Commission is required to continuously monitor imports of sensitive products and submit quarterly reports.
  • Thresholds for triggering safeguard measures have been lowered to enable faster responses to price pressures or volume increases.
  • Politically, this seeks to strengthen confidence in the trade agreement and ensure fair competition.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Non-attached Members (NI)
For21
  • 21For
  • 4Against
  • 1Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details
Patriots for Europe (PfE)
For77
  • 77For
  • 0Against
  • 1Abstention
  • 7Did not vote
View details
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
For67
  • 67For
  • 8Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)
For9
  • 9For
  • 0Against
  • 14Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details
European People's Party (EPP)
For16
  • 16For
  • 156Against
  • 1Abstention
  • 15Did not vote
View details
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)
For3
  • 3For
  • 39Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details
Renew Europe (Renew)
For2
  • 2For
  • 64Against
  • 1Abstention
  • 8Did not vote
View details
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
For0
  • 0For
  • 112Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 24Did not vote
View details
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
For0
  • 0For
  • 49Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
Roman HaiderRoman Haider
AustriaPfE
For
Anna ZalewskaAnna Zalewska
PolandECR
For
Mieke AndrieseMieke Andriese
NetherlandsPfE
For
Joachim Stanisław BrudzińskiJoachim Stanisław Brudziński
PolandECR
For
Volker SchnurrbuschVolker Schnurrbusch
GermanyESN
For
Jana NagyováJana Nagyová
CzechiaPfE
For
Vilis KrištopansVilis Krištopans
LatviaPfE
For
Alexandre VarautAlexandre Varaut
FrancePfE
For
András GyürkAndrás Gyürk
HungaryPfE
For
Monika BeňováMonika Beňová
SlovakiaNI
For
Show more
← Go back
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en