EN

Vote in the European Parliament

Implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products

Gabriel Mato – Article 3 – § 1 – Am 25= 55=
Date: 16.12.2025·Reference: A10-0254/2025
Rapporteur: Gabriel Mato
protective clauseagricultural tradecooperation policyinterim agreement (EU)trade agreementcooperation agreement (EU)tariff policytrade agreement (EU)trade policyMercosur

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 318 For
  • 330 Against
  • 10 Abstention
  • 61 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 25 · Tabled by The Left Verts/ALEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Manon Aubry, Lynn Boylan, Luke Ming Flanagan, Kathleen Funchion, Anja Hazekamp, Danilo Della Valle, Arash Saeidi

Added: 1 a. For point (b), “under such conditions” shall be understood as conditions under which the production in the exporting country takes place are at least equivalent to those in the EU in terms of the protection of human, animal, plant life or health, and the protection of exhaustible natural resources. For greater certainty, the use of chemical substances banned in the EU may be a reason to impose a safeguard measure.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE779.036

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (239 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0322(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage4 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral3 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage12 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Plenary7 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Negotiations42 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Committee stage7 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Plenary36 days until the next step
  8. Recorded: Signature8 days until the next step
  9. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (38)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Tabling for plenary
  17. Tabling for plenary
  18. Tabling for plenary
  19. Tabling for plenary
  20. Text amended in plenary
  21. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  22. Plenary vote
  23. Plenary vote results
  24. Interinstitutional negotiations
  25. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  26. Tabling for plenary
  27. Tabling for plenary
  28. Tabling for plenary
  29. Tabling for plenary
  30. Tabling for plenary
  31. Tabling for plenary
  32. Tabling for plenary
  33. Tabling for plenary
  34. Parliament’s first-reading position
  35. Plenary vote
  36. Plenary vote results
  37. Signature
  38. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Roll-call minutesParliament documentProcedure file (OEIL)

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • This regulation establishes a bilateral safeguard clause for agricultural products under the EU-MERCOSUR agreement.
  • Its aim is to protect sensitive agricultural sectors from market disruptions caused by increased imports from Mercosur countries.
  • The Commission is required to continuously monitor imports of sensitive products and submit quarterly reports.
  • Thresholds for triggering safeguard measures have been lowered to enable faster responses to price pressures or volume increases.
  • Politically, this seeks to strengthen confidence in the trade agreement and ensure fair competition.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Non-attached Members (NI)
For16
  • 16For
  • 7Against
  • 5Abstention
  • 2Did not vote
View details
Patriots for Europe (PfE)
For77
  • 77For
  • 0Against
  • 1Abstention
  • 7Did not vote
View details
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
For25
  • 25For
  • 101Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 10Did not vote
View details
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
For62
  • 62For
  • 11Against
  • 1Abstention
  • 5Did not vote
View details
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
For47
  • 47For
  • 0Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 6Did not vote
View details
European People's Party (EPP)
For20
  • 20For
  • 150Against
  • 3Abstention
  • 15Did not vote
View details
Renew Europe (Renew)
For8
  • 8For
  • 59Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 8Did not vote
View details
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)
For21
  • 21For
  • 2Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)
For42
  • 42For
  • 0Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
Tomasz BuczekTomasz Buczek
PolandPfE
For
Nikos PapandreouNikos Papandreou
GreeceS&D
For
Ton DiepeveenTon Diepeveen
NetherlandsPfE
For
Lara MagoniLara Magoni
ItalyECR
For
Maria NoichlMaria Noichl
GermanyS&D
For
Patryk JakiPatryk Jaki
PolandECR
For
Biljana BorzanBiljana Borzan
CroatiaS&D
For
Aleksandar NikolicAleksandar Nikolic
FrancePfE
For
Mario MantovaniMario Mantovani
ItalyECR
For
Cristina GuardaCristina Guarda
ItalyGreens/EFA
For
Show more
← Go back
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en