EN
Deutsch
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Motion for a resolution
Date: 25.11.2025Reference: B10-0490/2025pesticide residueherbicidefoodstuffmarket approvalfood inspectiontransgenic plantfood safetyanimal feedingstuffsoil seed rapeimplementing decision
Overall Result
Adopted- 456 For
- 166 Against
- 21 Abstention
- 76 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (353 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2895(RSP) · RSP
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (2)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The renewal of authorization for genetically modified MON 88302 rapeseed is contested due to environmental and health concerns.
- The glyphosate tolerance of the crop and its potential impact on biodiversity and ecosystems are key issues.
- While EFSA found no new hazards, long-term effects and cumulative risks were not sufficiently assessed.
- The Parliament criticizes inadequate monitoring plans and demands adherence to the precautionary principle.
- Additionally, a reform of the GMO approval process is called for to address democratic shortcomings.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For26
- 26For
- 2Against
- 1Abstention
- 1Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For118
- 118For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 14Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For31
- 31For
- 34Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For49
- 49For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For53
- 53For
- 112Against
- 6Abstention
- 17Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For61
- 61For
- 12Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For64
- 64For
- 6Against
- 9Abstention
- 6Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For35
- 35For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For19
- 19For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Netherlands | S&D | For | |
| Netherlands | Renew | For | |
 Latvia | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Croatia | EPP | For | |
 Hungary | EPP | For | |
 Spain | S&D | For | |
 Luxembourg | EPP | For | |
 Italy | ECR | For | |
 Poland | EPP | For | |
| Poland | S&D | For |
