Vote in the European Parliament

A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 24 – Am 16

Date: 25.11.2025·Reference: A10-0231/2025
Rapporteur: Tineke Strik

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 177 For
  • 451 Against
  • 15 Abstention
  • 76 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 16 · Tabled by ESNView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Christine Anderson, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Milan Uhrík

24. Deplores the fact Removed: that, despite the CJEU ruling finding the relevant legislation to be in breach of EU law, the Hungarian authorities have not taken steps to restore the ability of affected higher education institutions, such as the Central European University, to operate freely in Hungary, and that the Commission closed a follow-up infringement case37 ; calls on the Commission to pursue all necessary legal and financial measures to safeguard educational institutions, students and academic staff against political interference; 37 Judgment of 6 October 2020, European Commission v Hungary, C-66/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:792. Added: that legal measures taken by the Hungarian Government against the Soros-funded left activist Central European University are being criticised;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE778.835v01-00

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (353 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2018/0902(NLE) · NLE

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Latest recorded: Plenary353 days since this step began

No recorded activities in the stored source.

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • This report assesses the risk of a serious breach of EU fundamental values such as democracy, the rule of law, and human rights by Hungary.
  • Key issues include systemic deficiencies in the judiciary, anti-corruption measures, and academic freedom that remain unresolved.
  • The political aim is to restore compliance with EU standards and unlock frozen EU funds.
  • The document highlights Hungary’s failure to implement EU recommendations and rulings from international courts.
  • The goal is to increase pressure on Hungary to enact essential reforms.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
ItalyECR
For
LithuaniaECR
For
GermanyESN
For
HungaryPfE
For
AustriaPfE
For
GermanyNI
For
FrancePfE
For
BulgariaESN
For
SlovakiaNI
For
SlovakiaESN
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en