Vote in the European Parliament

A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 12 – Am 14

Date: 25.11.2025·Reference: A10-0231/2025
Rapporteur: Tineke Strik

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 194 For
  • 439 Against
  • 8 Abstention
  • 78 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 14 · Tabled by ESNView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Milan Uhrík

12. Removed: Insists that the measures required for the release of EU funding, as defined by the relevant decisions taken under the Common Provisions Regulation, the RRF Regulation and the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation, must be assessed in a coherent manner as an integral package and that no payments should be made while deficiencies persist in one or more areas, even if progress is made in others; notes that the Commission should be prepared to take the necessary steps swiftly where the authorities have adopted and properly implemented remedial measures fully and in an irreversible manner; calls Added: Calls on the Commission to ensure that Removed: such Added: its assessments always remain strictly impartial and free from politicisation, political bargaining or favouritism, Added: for instance as a result of the input of EU-funded activist non-governmental organisations, as such practices would otherwise undermine both the effectiveness and the legitimacy … a view to ensuring the efficient, transparent and equitable use of EU Removed: funds, especially in Member States where there are serious concerns regarding corruption, the misuse of public funds or non-transparent public procurement practices; Added: funds in all Member States in the same way;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE778.835v01-00

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (353 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2018/0902(NLE) · NLE

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Latest recorded: Plenary353 days since this step began

No recorded activities in the stored source.

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • This report assesses the risk of a serious breach of EU fundamental values such as democracy, the rule of law, and human rights by Hungary.
  • Key issues include systemic deficiencies in the judiciary, anti-corruption measures, and academic freedom that remain unresolved.
  • The political aim is to restore compliance with EU standards and unlock frozen EU funds.
  • The document highlights Hungary’s failure to implement EU recommendations and rulings from international courts.
  • The goal is to increase pressure on Hungary to enact essential reforms.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
FranceECR
For
PolandECR
For
FrancePfE
For
RomaniaECR
For
HungaryPfE
For
PolandECR
For
PolandPfE
For
ItalyPfE
For
PolandECR
For
SlovakiaNI
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en