EN
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)
Evelyn Regner – Recital 18 – Am 104
Date: 13.11.2025Reference: A10-0194/2025multinational enterprisetax collectiontransnational corporationbasis of tax assessmentparent companysingle marketcorporation taxgroup of companiestax evasionEuropean tax cooperationtax harmonisationtax law
Overall Result
Rejected- 171 For
- 431 Against
- 18 Abstention
- 98 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (393 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2023/0321(CNS) · CNS
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (17)
- Committee report tabled
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Text amended in plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- This directive proposes a unified framework for corporate taxation in the EU to standardize the calculation of tax bases across member states.
- It seeks to reduce compliance costs, prevent tax avoidance, and eliminate distortions caused by varying national tax systems.
- The initiative aligns with international standards, such as OECD/G20 agreements, to ensure coherence in global taxation.
- Companies operating cross-border would benefit from simplified rules and a consolidated tax base, while member states retain sovereignty over tax rates.
- A formula-based allocation mechanism is envisioned to distribute taxable profits fairly among countries where economic activity occurs.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For9
- 9For
- 10Against
- 3Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For67
- 67For
- 0Against
- 9Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For23
- 23For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For64
- 64For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 12Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For1
- 1For
- 44Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For6
- 6For
- 162Against
- 1Abstention
- 19Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For1
- 1For
- 118Against
- 0Abstention
- 17Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For0
- 0For
- 64Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For0
- 0For
- 33Against
- 2Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Slovakia | NI | For | |
 France | PfE | For | |
 Germany | ESN | For | |
| France | PfE | For | |
 Italy | ECR | For | |
 Latvia | ECR | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For | |
| Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
| Latvia | PfE | For | |
 Hungary | PfE | For |
