ENVote in the European Parliament
Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)
Evelyn Regner – Article 45 – Am 92S
Date: 13.11.2025Reference: A10-0194/2025multinational enterprisetax collectiontransnational corporationbasis of tax assessmentparent companysingle marketcorporation taxgroup of companiestax evasionEuropean tax cooperationtax harmonisationtax law
Overall Result
Rejected- 79 For
- 501 Against
- 53 Abstention
- 85 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (393 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2023/0321(CNS) · CNS
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (17)
- Committee report tabled
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Text amended in plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- This directive proposes a unified framework for corporate taxation in the EU to standardize the calculation of tax bases across member states.
- It seeks to reduce compliance costs, prevent tax avoidance, and eliminate distortions caused by varying national tax systems.
- The initiative aligns with international standards, such as OECD/G20 agreements, to ensure coherence in global taxation.
- Companies operating cross-border would benefit from simplified rules and a consolidated tax base, while member states retain sovereignty over tax rates.
- A formula-based allocation mechanism is envisioned to distribute taxable profits fairly among countries where economic activity occurs.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For10
- 10For
- 7Against
- 7Abstention
- 6Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For38
- 38For
- 1Against
- 1Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For28
- 28For
- 47Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For2
- 2For
- 1Against
- 43Abstention
- 7Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For1
- 1For
- 70Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For0
- 0For
- 172Against
- 0Abstention
- 16Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For0
- 0For
- 63Against
- 0Abstention
- 12Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For0
- 0For
- 121Against
- 0Abstention
- 15Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For0
- 0For
- 19Against
- 2Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Belgium | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Slovakia | NI | For | |
 Italy | GUE/NGL | For | |
 France | PfE | For | |
| France | PfE | For | |
 Spain | GUE/NGL | For | |
| France | GUE/NGL | For | |
| France | PfE | For | |
 Germany | GUE/NGL | For | |
| France | Greens/EFA | For |
