Vote in the European Parliament

Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain

Céline Imart – After recital 3 – Am 121
Date: 08.10.2025·Reference: A10-0161/2025
Rapporteur: Céline Imart

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 172 For
  • 315 Against
  • 133 Abstention
  • 99 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 121 · Tabled by The LeftView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Manon Aubry, Arash Saeidi, Marina Mesure

Added: (3 a) It is important to stress the contradiction between, on the one hand, trade agreements with Mercosur and the United States, which boost imports into the EU of food and agricultural products and fuel unfair competition, and, on the other hand, the urgent need to strengthen food sovereignty and safeguard European farmers by guaranteeing fair prices and a fair distribution of added value in the supply chain. The European Parliament should therefore reject the trade agreements with Mercosur and the United States.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE776.234

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (107 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2024/0319(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral71 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage164 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary26 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Negotiations182 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Committee stage63 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Plenary28 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Signature21 days until the next step
  8. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (29)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Plenary debate
  15. Text amended in plenary
  16. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Plenary vote results
  19. Interinstitutional negotiations
  20. Interinstitutional negotiations
  21. Interinstitutional negotiations
  22. Interinstitutional negotiations
  23. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  24. Tabling for plenary
  25. Parliament’s first-reading position
  26. Plenary vote
  27. Plenary vote results
  28. Signature
  29. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Strengthening farmers' position in the food supply chain.
  • Focus on transparency and fair pricing throughout the supply chain.
  • Promotion of producer organisations and cooperatives as key actors.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
SwedenGreens/EFA
For
EstoniaS&D
For
FranceGUE/NGL
For
FrancePfE
For
AustriaGreens/EFA
For
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
PolandESN
For
AustriaPfE
For
FrancePfE
For
FrancePfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en