Vote in the European Parliament

Banking Union – annual report 2024

Ralf Seekatz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 08.05.2025·Reference: A10-0044/2025
Rapporteur: Ralf Seekatz

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 345 For
  • 135 Against
  • 62 Abstention
  • 177 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (597 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2055(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral28 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage139 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary597 days since this step began
Recorded activities (12)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Plenary debate
  11. Plenary vote
  12. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Banking union aims to prevent taxpayer-funded bank rescues via stabilization.
  • Completion requires European deposit insurance system and Basel-III implementation.
  • Focus on competitiveness and cross-border banking consolidation.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (6)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Paragraph 1

    Tabled by Charlie Weimers, Dick Erixon, Beatrice Timgren · ECR

    … without the establishment of its third pillar, the European deposit insurance scheme; Added: emphasises that every Member State has the right to decide whether to adopt the euro;

  2. Amendment 2Adopted

    Paragraph 18 a (new)

    Tabled by Pasquale Tridico, Giorgos Georgiou · The Left

    Added: 18a. Acknowledges the growing phenomenon of bank branch closures, which contributes to the risk of ‘bank desertification’ in certain regions, with a particularly negative impact on vulnerable citizens without digital access; emphasises the critical role smaller banks play in ensuring access to essential banking services, especially in rural and remote areas, thereby supporting households, SMEs and local economies; notes that the high supervisory costs and regulatory burdens can pose significant challenges for smaller banks; underscores the need to apply the principle of proportionality in banking supervision, ensuring that the intensity of regulation is tailored to the size, risk profile and business model of institutions, while taking into account the essential territorial role of smaller banks and their specific characteristics.

  3. Amendment 5Rejected

    Paragraph 10 a (new)

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN

    Added: 10a. Calls on the Commission, in the interest of budgetary seriousness and institutional simplification, not to create a new separate jurisdiction for Union banks carrying out significant cross-border operations;

  4. Amendment 6Rejected

    Paragraph 16

    Tabled by Rada Laykova · ESN

    16. Removed: Notes the ECB’s progress Added: Regrets the ECB’s focus on the digital euro Removed: and the parliamentary dialogue being held with the ECB on the topic; understands existing reservations, such as with regard to its offline functionality, given that offline transactions reduce visibility and impair financial crime prevention; Added: despite the limited arguments for it; understands existing reservations; recalls that the digital euro should Removed: complement, not Added: only complement, never replace, cash; considers that the decision on whether or not to introduce … and other areas that go beyond the strict remit of monetary policy; Added: notes the recent prohibition on the establishment, issuance, circulation and use of a central bank digital currency within the jurisdiction of the United States;

  5. Amendment 8Rejected

    Paragraph 32

    Tabled by Rada Laykova · ESN

    … the event of a bank’s failure; stresses that resorting to using taxpayers’ Removed: money must be avoided, Added: money, directly or indirectly, is to be precluded, which is still a key lesson learned from the global financial crisis; …

  6. Amendment 9Rejected

    Paragraph 35

    Tabled by Rada Laykova, Sarah Knafo · ESN

    35. Removed: Notes that any reliance on taxpayer money for the resolution of banks, Added: Strongly opposes the use of taxpayer money to resolve bank failures, including for liquidity support, Removed: should be avoided, in keeping with the principles of fiscal and social responsibility and market …

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
GermanyEPP
For
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
SpainEPP
For
PolandEPP
For
FranceEPP
For
BelgiumEPP
For
ItalyGUE/NGL
For
BulgariaRenew
For
NetherlandsS&D
For
RomaniaEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en