Vote in the European Parliament

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 - all sections

A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 75 – Am 69
Date: 23.10.2024·Reference: A10-0008/2024
Rapporteur: Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 333 For
  • 267 Against
  • 37 Abstention
  • 82 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 69 · Tabled by MembersView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Niclas Herbst, Andreas Schwab, Lukas Mandl, Christian Doleschal, Verena Mertens, Oliver Schenk, Christian Ehler, Assita Kanko, Helmut Brandstätter, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Tomas Tobé, Geadis Geadi, Marion Walsmann, Flavio Tosi, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Svenja Hahn, Loránt Vincze, Moritz Körner, Miriam Lexmann, Angelika Niebler, Andrey Kovatchev, Sabine Verheyen, Hildegard Bentele, Sven Simon, Christine Schneider, Alice Teodorescu Måwe, Stefan Berger, Ralf Seekatz, Jens Gieseke, Andrea Wechsler, Tomáš Zdechovský, Lena Düpont, Petras Auštrevičius, Rihards Kols, Andreas Glück, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Monika Hohlmeier, Charlie Weimers, Beatrice Timgren, Dick Erixon, Niels Geuking, Norbert Lins

Added: 75 a. Calls on the Palestinian Authority to remove all educational materials and contents, that fail to adhere to UNESCO standards by the next shool year, in particular those that contain antisemitism as defined by the IHRA classification endorsed by the Union, incitement to violence, hate speech, and glorification of terrorism; recalls paragraph 99 of the discharge resolution adopted by Parliament in April 2024, which directly links the October 7 atrocities to the inciteful content contained in Palestinian educational materials and demands that Union funds be made conditional on full curriculum reform; recalls the Commission’s assessment of the Palestinian textbooks, as evaluated in the Georg Eckert Institute's EU-funded report, clearly highlights the persistent presence of deeply problematic content that remains a serious concern; notes that the Commission will carry out close scrutiny to ensure that no Union funds are allocated, directly or indirectly, to the drafting, teaching, or exposure of such educational materials to Palestinian children, including those provided by UN organisations.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE764.137

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (624 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2024/0176(BUD) · BUD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage94 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral14 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage15 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Plenary32 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Committee stage4 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Plenary7 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Signature92 days until the next step
  8. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (32)
  1. Committee opinion tabled
  2. Committee opinion tabled
  3. Committee opinion tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee opinion adopted
  7. Committee opinion adopted
  8. Committee opinion adopted
  9. Committee opinion adopted
  10. Committee opinion adopted
  11. Committee opinion adopted
  12. Committee opinion adopted
  13. Committee opinion adopted
  14. Committee opinion adopted
  15. Committee opinion adopted
  16. Referral to committee
  17. Committee opinion adopted
  18. Committee opinion adopted
  19. Committee report tabled
  20. Committee opinion adopted
  21. Committee report adopted
  22. Tabling for plenary
  23. Plenary debate
  24. Plenary vote
  25. Plenary vote results
  26. Committee report adopted
  27. Tabling for plenary
  28. Plenary debate
  29. Signature
  30. Plenary vote
  31. Plenary vote results
  32. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary debate
  4. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • EU budget 2025 aims to boost competitiveness and sustainability investments.
  • Criticism of Council cuts in programmes like Erasmus+ and Horizon Europe.
  • Demand for 65 % financing of NextGenerationEU costs via cancelled commitments.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
HungaryEPP
For
BelgiumRenew
For
FinlandEPP
For
FranceEPP
For
FrancePfE
For
BelgiumRenew
For
SpainEPP
For
DenmarkRenew
For
GermanyS&D
For
ItalyPfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en