Vote in the European Parliament

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 - all sections

A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 75 – Am 1
Date: 23.10.2024·Reference: A10-0008/2024
Rapporteur: Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 280 For
  • 304 Against
  • 51 Abstention
  • 84 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 1 · Tabled by MembersView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Monika Hohlmeier, Helmut Brandstätter, Engin Eroglu, Andreas Glück, Svenja Hahn, Moritz Körner, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Christine Singer, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Joachim Streit, Hildegard Bentele, Stefan Berger, Daniel Caspary, Laurent Castillo, François-Xavier Bellamy, Christophe Gomart, Céline Imart, Christian Doleschal, Lena Düpont, Christian Ehler, Jens Gieseke, Niclas Herbst, Ondřej Kolář, Miriam Lexmann, Norbert Lins, Lukas Mandl, Angelika Winzig, Reinhold Lopatka, Sophia Kircher, Alexander Bernhuber, David McAllister, Verena Mertens, Angelika Niebler, Oliver Schenk, Christine Schneider, Ralf Seekatz, Sven Simon, Johan Van Overtveldt, Sabine Verheyen, Andrea Wechsler, Tomáš Zdechovský

Added: 75 a. stresses that funding from the Union budget should under no circumstances be given directly or indirectly to persons, groups or entities linked to terrorist activities; recalls that there have been credible reports that UNRWA has employed members of the terrorist organisation Hamas, most recently the head of UNRWA’s teachers association in Lebanon, Fateh al-Sharif; highlights that it has been proven several times that members of Hamas were employed by UNRWA and that several of UNRWA’s school buildings and the headquarter provided cover for the extensive tunnel system of Hamas in Gaza; acknowledges, however, the critical role of UNRWA in providing humanitarian aid, which cannot be interrupted to ensure access to basic services for all persons affected by the ongoing conflict in the Palestinian territories; insists on the strengthening of the screenings, checks and audits of all funds given to UNRWA and any of its sub-contractors to ensure that not a single Euro ends up financing, contributing to or supporting Hamas or Hezbollah activities; calls for the diversification of funding of humanitarian aid provided to the Palestinian population, for example to organisations like Doctors Without Borders, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, WHO or the World Food Programme; underlines that Parliament reserves the right to call for a reserve in case of non-compliance and maladministration by the Commission;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE764.137

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (624 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2024/0176(BUD) · BUD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage94 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral14 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage15 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Plenary32 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Committee stage4 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Plenary7 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Signature92 days until the next step
  8. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (32)
  1. Committee opinion tabled
  2. Committee opinion tabled
  3. Committee opinion tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee opinion adopted
  7. Committee opinion adopted
  8. Committee opinion adopted
  9. Committee opinion adopted
  10. Committee opinion adopted
  11. Committee opinion adopted
  12. Committee opinion adopted
  13. Committee opinion adopted
  14. Committee opinion adopted
  15. Committee opinion adopted
  16. Referral to committee
  17. Committee opinion adopted
  18. Committee opinion adopted
  19. Committee report tabled
  20. Committee opinion adopted
  21. Committee report adopted
  22. Tabling for plenary
  23. Plenary debate
  24. Plenary vote
  25. Plenary vote results
  26. Committee report adopted
  27. Tabling for plenary
  28. Plenary debate
  29. Signature
  30. Plenary vote
  31. Plenary vote results
  32. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary debate
  4. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • EU budget 2025 aims to boost competitiveness and sustainability investments.
  • Criticism of Council cuts in programmes like Erasmus+ and Horizon Europe.
  • Demand for 65 % financing of NextGenerationEU costs via cancelled commitments.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
CroatiaEPP
For
GermanyEPP
For
GermanyEPP
For
GermanyEPP
For
LuxembourgEPP
For
FrancePfE
For
LithuaniaRenew
For
GermanyEPP
For
HungaryEPP
For
SpainEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en