Vote in the European Parliament

Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council, the European Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Central Bank, the European Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions, establishing an Interinstitutional Body for Ethical Standards for Members of Institutions and advisory bodies mentioned in Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union

Daniel Freund – After § 9 – Am 5
Date: 25.04.2024·Reference: A9-0181/2024
Rapporteur: Daniel Freund

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 250 For
  • 279 Against
  • 15 Abstention
  • 161 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 5 · Proposal for a decision · Tabled by The LeftView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Leila Chaibi, Manon Aubry, Nikolaj Villumsen, Helmut Scholz, Marc Botenga

Added: 9a. Stresses that the European Parliament should lead by example; calls, in order to limit potential conflicts of interest, for a ban on Members of the European Parliament performing paid side jobs or activities on behalf of organisations or individuals covered by the scope of the Transparency Register, in particular as managers or consultants, or as members or directors of the boards of directors or advisory boards of publicly listed companies;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE762.578

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (935 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2008(ACI) · ACI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage21 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral12 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stageNext step on the same day
  4. Latest recorded: Plenary935 days since this step began
Recorded activities (7)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee report adopted
  4. Tabling for plenary
  5. Plenary debate
  6. Plenary vote
  7. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Establishment of an interinstitutional ethics body for EU bodies.
  • Aim: Enhance transparency and integrity in EU institutions.
  • Criticism of insufficient legal basis and power balance.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
SpainS&D
For
FinlandNI
For
ItalyS&D
For
SwedenS&D
For
RomaniaRenew
For
GermanyS&D
For
AustriaS&D
For
SpainNI
For
FranceGreens/EFA
For
SlovakiaNI
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en