Vote in the European Parliament

Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council, the European Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Central Bank, the European Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions, establishing an Interinstitutional Body for Ethical Standards for Members of Institutions and advisory bodies mentioned in Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union

Daniel Freund – § 9 – Am 6
Date: 25.04.2024·Reference: A9-0181/2024
Rapporteur: Daniel Freund

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 107 For
  • 415 Against
  • 18 Abstention
  • 165 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 6 · Proposal for a decision · Tabled by IDView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Antonio Maria Rinaldi, Gerolf Annemans, Gilles Lebreton

9. Believes Removed: the body should rely on the existing powers of institutions to ask their members for information or on the agreement of national authorities to share information; believes that the independent experts should be able to exchange information with national authorities where necessary for the performance of their tasks, while treating such information with the same confidentiality as the originating authority did; stresses in this regard that the independent experts should have access to the administrative documents of participating parties, especially the party consulting them on a case, Added: that, in order to Removed: allow them to carry out well-reasoned and well-documented assessments; Added: prevent the repetition of episodes such as Qatargate, there is no need for an ethics body such as the one being proposed, but rather for the proper application of the Institution's internal rules and compliance with the law; recalls that, in any case, the conduct concerned was criminal and not merely "unethical" in nature and, therefore, the presence of an ethics body would not have prevented its occurrence; reiterates, for this reason, the need to establish a committee of inquiry to shed light on the political responsibilities resulting from the corruption affair and from the involvement of political figures in this Parliament;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE762.578

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (935 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2008(ACI) · ACI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage21 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral12 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stageNext step on the same day
  4. Latest recorded: Plenary935 days since this step began
Recorded activities (7)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee report adopted
  4. Tabling for plenary
  5. Plenary debate
  6. Plenary vote
  7. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Establishment of an interinstitutional ethics body for EU bodies.
  • Aim: Enhance transparency and integrity in EU institutions.
  • Criticism of insufficient legal basis and power balance.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
HungaryNI
For
FranceNI
For
ItalyPfE
For
FranceNI
For
SwedenECR
For
FranceECR
For
NetherlandsNI
For
PolandNI
For
PolandNI
For
PolandECR
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en