Vote in the European Parliament

Guidelines for the 2025 Budget - Section III

Victor Negrescu – After § 46 – Am 17
Date: 13.03.2024·Reference: A9-0068/2024
Rapporteur: Victor Negrescu

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 103 For
  • 403 Against
  • 70 Abstention
  • 129 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 17 · Tabled by The LeftView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda

Added: 46a. Calls for greater support for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) to ensure proper funding so it can carry on and step up its humanitarian work saving lives;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE760.473

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (983 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2023/2220(BUI) · BUI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage47 days until the next step
  2. Latest recorded: Plenary983 days since this step began
Recorded activities (17)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Committee opinion adopted
  3. Committee opinion adopted
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee opinion adopted
  7. Committee opinion adopted
  8. Committee opinion adopted
  9. Committee opinion adopted
  10. Committee opinion adopted
  11. Committee opinion adopted
  12. Committee opinion adopted
  13. Committee report adopted
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Plenary debate
  16. Plenary vote
  17. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • 2025 budget as investment tool for EU priorities.
  • Focus on climate neutrality , competitiveness and social justice.
  • Criticism of MFF revision and demand for new own resources.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
ItalyS&D
For
SpainRenew
For
IrelandEPP
For
ItalyNI
For
NetherlandsRenew
For
ItalyS&D
For
FranceS&D
For
RomaniaS&D
For
ItalyNI
For
FranceGUE/NGL
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en