Vote in the European Parliament

Guidelines for the 2025 Budget - Section III

Victor Negrescu – After § 42 – Am 40
Date: 13.03.2024·Reference: A9-0068/2024
Rapporteur: Victor Negrescu

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 272 For
  • 271 Against
  • 31 Abstention
  • 131 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 40 · Tabled by MembersView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Moritz Körner, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Tomáš Zdechovský, Johan Van Overtveldt, JanChristoph Oetjen, Asger Christensen, Marion Walsmann, Attila Ara-Kovács, Michael Kauch, Michaela Šojdrová, Erik Poulsen, Milan Zver, Lukas Mandl, Petras Auštrevičius, Frédérique Ries, Norbert Lins, Stefan Berger, Miriam Lexmann, Svenja Hahn, Christine Schneider, Lena Düpont, Niclas Herbst, Markus Ferber, Daniel Caspary, Hildegard Bentele, Dennis Radtke, Karolin Braunsberger-Reinhold, Morten Løkkegaard, Monika Hohlmeier, Christian Doleschal, Sabine Verheyen, Axel Voss, Leszek Miller, Andreas Glück, Ljudmila Novak, Ralf Seekatz, David Lega, Andrey Kovatchev, Ondřej Kovařík, Ondřej Knotek, Martin Hlaváček, Martina Dlabajová, Dita Charanzová, Engin Eroglu, Bergur Løkke Rasmussen, Angelika Niebler

Added: 42a. Regrets that the Commission has not conditioned payments to third countries more effectively as a means to enforce the Union’s geopolitical interests, in particular in relation to the Union’s migration policies, defence concerns, as well as in relation to human rights; calls on the Commission to set specific conditions and milestones for its payments to third countries in accordance with the particular political interests of the Union and to suspend without undue delay a relevant part of the payments if a third country fails to meet the set conditions; expects all responsible Commissioners-designate in their hearings to commit to this stricter interest-based conditioning of the EU budget towards third countries;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE760.473

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (983 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2023/2220(BUI) · BUI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage47 days until the next step
  2. Latest recorded: Plenary983 days since this step began
Recorded activities (17)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Committee opinion adopted
  3. Committee opinion adopted
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee opinion adopted
  7. Committee opinion adopted
  8. Committee opinion adopted
  9. Committee opinion adopted
  10. Committee opinion adopted
  11. Committee opinion adopted
  12. Committee opinion adopted
  13. Committee report adopted
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Plenary debate
  16. Plenary vote
  17. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • 2025 budget as investment tool for EU priorities.
  • Focus on climate neutrality , competitiveness and social justice.
  • Criticism of MFF revision and demand for new own resources.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
BelgiumEPP
For
ItalyEPP
For
ItalyECR
For
DenmarkRenew
For
DenmarkEPP
For
HungaryS&D
For
SpainEPP
For
NetherlandsRenew
For
PortugalEPP
For
SpainEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en