Vote in the European Parliament

Amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic

Isabel García Muñoz - Considérant 9 - Am 61S
Date: 12.03.2024·Reference: A9-0047/2024
Rapporteur: Isabel García Muñoz

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 295 For
  • 300 Against
  • 21 Abstention
  • 89 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 61 · Tabled by MembersView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Dominique Riquet, Thomas Rudner, Barbara Thaler, Pascal Canfin, Ciarán Cuffe, Herbert Dorfmann, Karima Delli, Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, Christian Sagartz, Catherine Amalric, Fabienne Keller, Stéphane Bijoux, Bernard Guetta, Max Orville, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin, Pierre Karleskind, Christophe Grudler, Ilana Cicurel, Catherine Chabaud, Laurence Farreng, Jérémy Decerle, Guy Lavocat, Nathalie Loiseau, Irène Tolleret, Gilles Boyer, Sandro Gozi, Pascal Durand, Salima Yenbou, Sylvie Brunet, Charles Goerens, Marco Zullo, Andreas Schieder, Francisco Guerreiro, Jakop G. Dalunde, Ignazio Corrao, Caroline Roose, Claude Gruffat, Damien Carême, Pär Holmgren, Alice Kuhnke, Kira Marie Peter-Hansen, Mounir Satouri, David Cormand, Katrin Langensiepen, Sara Matthieu, Lydie Massard, Ville Niinistö, Anna Deparnay-Grunenberg, Grace O'Sullivan, Jutta Paulus, Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Theresa Bielowski, Benoît Lutgen, Tilly Metz, Frédérique Ries, Reinhard Bütikofer, Niklas Nienaß, Brice Hortefeux, Geoffroy Didier, Anne Sander, Pierre Larrouturou, François Thiollet, Evelyn Regner, Laurence Sailliet, Daniel Freund, Nicola Danti

Removed: (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross-border operations between neighbouring Member States that allow such vehicle combinations on their territories, without limitation in the number of borders crossed as long as they comply with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions for EMS established by Member States within their respective territories. This is to ensure that EMS used in cross-border operations comply with the common lowest weight and dimension limit for EMS applicable in those Member States. In the interests of safety of operations, transparency and legal clarity, common conditions should be established for the circulation of EMS in national and international traffic, including providing clear information on the weights and dimensions limits for EMS and on parts of the road network compatible with specifications of such vehicles, and monitoring the impacts of the use of EMS on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal share. Added: deleted

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE760.461

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Negotiations · (339 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2023/0265(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral36 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage124 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary657 days until the next step
  4. Latest recorded: Negotiations339 days since this step began
Recorded activities (10)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Parliament’s first-reading position with amendments
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
  9. Interinstitutional negotiations
  10. Interinstitutional negotiations
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Adjustment of weight and dimension rules for trucks and vehicle combinations.
  • Promotion of zero-emission technologies and intermodality in heavy-duty transport.
  • Harmonisation of permit procedures for special transports and EMS .
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 705

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
GermanyNI
For
SpainGreens/EFA
For
GreeceNI
For
NetherlandsGUE/NGL
For
PolandNI
For
CzechiaPfE
For
BelgiumNI
For
PolandECR
For
AustriaEPP
For
NetherlandsS&D
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en