Vote in the European Parliament
Amending Council Directive 96/53/EC laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorised dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorised weights in international traffic
Date: 12.03.2024Reference: A9-0047/2024Overall Result
Adopted- 330 For
- 207 Against
- 74 Abstention
- 94 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Negotiations · (339 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2023/0265(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Negotiations
Recorded activities (10)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Parliament’s first-reading position with amendments
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Interinstitutional negotiations
- Interinstitutional negotiations
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Adjustment of weight and dimension rules for trucks and vehicle combinations.
- Promotion of zero-emission technologies and intermodality in heavy-duty transport.
- Harmonisation of permit procedures for special transports and EMS .
Amendment history (7)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 52Rejected
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Tabled by Ciarán Cuffe · Verts/ALE
Member States may allow the circulation in their territories in national
Removed: and internationaltraffic of European Modular Systems subject to all of the following conditions: - Amendment 54Rejected
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Tabled by Ciarán Cuffe · Verts/ALE
Added: (d a) the Member States shall ensure that any decision regarding the circulation of European Modular Systems on their territories is subject to, and informed by, one or more public consultations
- Amendment 56Rejected
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Tabled by Ciarán Cuffe · Verts/ALE
Removed: Whenever a Member State allows, pursuant to this paragraph, the circulation of European Modular Systems in national traffic, it may not reject or prohibit the circulation in its territory of European Modular Systems in international traffic, provided that such systems do not exceed the maximum weights and dimensions set for European Modular Systems in national traffic.Added: deleted - Amendment 61Rejected
Recital 9
Tabled by Dominique Riquet, Thomas Rudner, Barbara Thaler +63 · Members
Removed: (9) European Modular Systems (EMS) have been used and trialled at length and have proven to be an interesting solution to improve the economic and energy efficiency of transport operations, while ensuring road safety and protection of infrastructure, thanks to their confinement to adequate parts of the road networks. Given national specificities, different economic interests, transportation needs and diverse transport infrastructure capacities in Member States, they are best placed to assess and authorise the circulation of EMS on their territories. At the same time, to enlarge the positive socio-economic and environmental impacts of the use of EMS, it is crucial to remove unnecessary barriers to their use in cross-border operations between neighbouring Member States that allow such vehicle combinations on their territories, without limitation in the number of borders crossed as long as they comply with the maximum authorised weights and dimensions for EMS established by Member States within their respective territories. This is to ensure that EMS used in cross-border operations comply with the common lowest weight and dimension limit for EMS applicable in those Member States. In the interests of safety of operations, transparency and legal clarity, common conditions should be established for the circulation of EMS in national and international traffic, including providing clear information on the weights and dimensions limits for EMS and on parts of the road network compatible with specifications of such vehicles, and monitoring the impacts of the use of EMS on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal share.Added: deleted - Amendment 62Rejected
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Tabled by Dominique Riquet, Thomas Rudner, Barbara Thaler +63 · Members
… with dimensions deviating from those laid down in Annex I also permits
Removed: the circulation of European Modular Systems pursuant to paragraph 4a, soAdded: motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers which comply with the dimensions laid down in Annex I to be used in such combinations as to achieve at least the loading length authorised in that Member … - Amendment 63Rejected
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Tabled by Dominique Riquet, Thomas Rudner, Barbara Thaler +63 · Members
Removed: Member States may allow the circulation in their territories in national and international traffic of European Modular Systems subject to all of the following conditions: (a) the Member States shall make publicly available, in an accessible and transparent way, the information related to the maximum weights and dimensions applicable to the circulation of European Modular Systems in their territories; (b) the Member States shall make publicly available, in an accessible and transparent way, the information related to the part of the road network where European Modular Systems can circulate; (c) the Member States shall ensure the connectivity of the part of the network where European Modular Systems can circulate in their territories with the road network of neighbouring Member States that also allow the circulation of European Modular Systems, in order to enable cross-border traffic; (d) the Member States shall set a monitoring system and assess the impact of European Modular Systems on road safety, on the road infrastructure, on modal cooperation, as well as the environmental impacts of European Modular Systems on the transport system, including the impacts on modal split.Added: deleted - Amendment 65Rejected
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Tabled by Dominique Riquet, Thomas Rudner, Barbara Thaler +60 · Verts/ALE Members
Removed: Article 4bAdded: deleted
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 31For
- 89Against
- 37Abstention
- 26Did not vote
- 113For
- 12Against
- 0Abstention
- 15Did not vote
- 126For
- 13Against
- 13Abstention
- 26Did not vote
- 50For
- 30Against
- 6Abstention
- 16Did not vote
- 10For
- 2Against
- 15Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 0For
- 11Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 0For
- 19Against
- 3Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 0For
- 31Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |