Vote in the European Parliament
SECOND REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2024, Section II – European Council and Council
Overall Result
Adopted- 434 For
- 203 Against
- 21 Abstention
- 61 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Other activity · (23 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/2147(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Official Journal
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Other activity
Recorded activities (18)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Committee report tabled
- Publication in the Official Journal
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
Amendment history (3)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Paragraph 21
Tabled by Ondřej Knotek · PfE
… Stresses that, while unanimity voting remains a core principle of the Treaties,
Removed: its application in certain circumstances and in critical policy areas can affect the Union's timelines and effectiveness, including by paralysing the Union’s decision-making process and thereby leaving it vulnerable to being blocked or prone to blackmail by individual Member States, particularly those that fail to respect the rule of law; calls for targeted Treaty reforms or, alternatively, practical improvements within the existing Treaty framework, in order to strengthen transparency, democratic decision-making, accountability and the efficiency of the Council's work; calls on the Council to follow up on previous Parliament resolutions calling for such reforms;Added: and its recourse to it constitutes a legitimate expression of democratic accountability by Member States’ governments; underlines that any debate on decision-making efficiency must fully respect the Treaties and cannot undermine the principle of conferral between the Union and its Member States;Paragraph 17
Tabled by Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka · ESN
17. Stresses that the current situation must be
Removed: improved through betterAdded: resolved through improved interinstitutional cooperation within the existingRemoved: framework of the Treaties; considers it necessary, as part of future revision of the Treaties, to clarify the discharge procedure and explicitly empower Parliament to grant discharge individually to all Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and urgesAdded: treaty framework; rejects any amendment to the Treaties or any expansion of Parliament’s powers on the grounds of the discharge procedure; calls on the Council toRemoved: actively engage with Parliament to address the current situation;Added: provide Parliament, in full and in a timely manner, with the information necessary for effective budgetary oversight;Paragraph 21
Tabled by Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka · ESN
21. Stresses
Removed: that, while unanimity voting remains a core principle of the Treaties, its application in certain circumstances and in critical policy areas can affect the Union's timelines and effectiveness, including by paralysing the Union’s decision-making process and thereby leaving it vulnerable to being blocked or prone to blackmail by individual Member States, particularly those that fail to respect the rule of law; calls for targeted Treaty reforms or, alternatively, practical improvements within the existing Treaty framework, in order to strengthen transparency, democratic decision-making, accountability and the efficiency of the Council's work; calls on the Council to follow up on previous Parliament resolutions calling for such reforms;Added: that the unanimity requirement laid down in the Treaties in the relevant policy areas protects the sovereignty and fundamental interests of the Member States; rejects attempts to undermine the principle of unanimity through Treaty amendments or alternative practical arrangements; stresses that issues relating to decision-making in the Council are not subject to the discharge procedure;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 69For
- 1Against
- 3Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 153For
- 2Against
- 10Abstention
- 20Did not vote
- 47For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 36For
- 4Against
- 2Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 6For
- 17Against
- 2Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 123For
- 3Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 0For
- 72Against
- 4Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 0For
- 80Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 0For
- 24Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |