Vote in the European Parliament

SECOND REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2024, Section II – European Council and Council

Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 21.10.2026·Reference: A10-0258/2026
Rapporteur: Pasquale Tridico

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 434 For
  • 203 Against
  • 21 Abstention
  • 61 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Other activity · (23 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/2147(DEC) · DEC

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral99 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage100 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary97 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Committee stage70 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Official Journal21 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Committee stage5 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Plenary15 days until the next step
  8. Latest recorded: Other activity23 days since this step began
Recorded activities (18)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Plenary debate
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
  9. Committee report tabled
  10. Publication in the Official Journal
  11. Committee amendments tabled
  12. Committee report adopted
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Other recorded activity
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

Amendment history (3)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 21

    Tabled by Ondřej Knotek · PfE

    … Stresses that, while unanimity voting remains a core principle of the Treaties, Removed: its application in certain circumstances and in critical policy areas can affect the Union's timelines and effectiveness, including by paralysing the Union’s decision-making process and thereby leaving it vulnerable to being blocked or prone to blackmail by individual Member States, particularly those that fail to respect the rule of law; calls for targeted Treaty reforms or, alternatively, practical improvements within the existing Treaty framework, in order to strengthen transparency, democratic decision-making, accountability and the efficiency of the Council's work; calls on the Council to follow up on previous Parliament resolutions calling for such reforms; Added: and its recourse to it constitutes a legitimate expression of democratic accountability by Member States’ governments; underlines that any debate on decision-making efficiency must fully respect the Treaties and cannot undermine the principle of conferral between the Union and its Member States;

  2. Amendment 2 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 17

    Tabled by Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka · ESN

    17. Stresses that the current situation must be Removed: improved through better Added: resolved through improved interinstitutional cooperation within the existing Removed: framework of the Treaties; considers it necessary, as part of future revision of the Treaties, to clarify the discharge procedure and explicitly empower Parliament to grant discharge individually to all Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and urges Added: treaty framework; rejects any amendment to the Treaties or any expansion of Parliament’s powers on the grounds of the discharge procedure; calls on the Council to Removed: actively engage with Parliament to address the current situation; Added: provide Parliament, in full and in a timely manner, with the information necessary for effective budgetary oversight;

  3. Amendment 3 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 21

    Tabled by Alexander Jungbluth, Stanisław Tyszka · ESN

    21. Stresses Removed: that, while unanimity voting remains a core principle of the Treaties, its application in certain circumstances and in critical policy areas can affect the Union's timelines and effectiveness, including by paralysing the Union’s decision-making process and thereby leaving it vulnerable to being blocked or prone to blackmail by individual Member States, particularly those that fail to respect the rule of law; calls for targeted Treaty reforms or, alternatively, practical improvements within the existing Treaty framework, in order to strengthen transparency, democratic decision-making, accountability and the efficiency of the Council's work; calls on the Council to follow up on previous Parliament resolutions calling for such reforms; Added: that the unanimity requirement laid down in the Treaties in the relevant policy areas protects the sovereignty and fundamental interests of the Member States; rejects attempts to undermine the principle of unanimity through Treaty amendments or alternative practical arrangements; stresses that issues relating to decision-making in the Council are not subject to the discharge procedure;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
GermanyEPP
For
SpainGreens/EFA
For
DenmarkRenew
For
CzechiaGreens/EFA
For
FranceEPP
For
HungaryEPP
For
EstoniaEPP
For
GreeceGUE/NGL
For
ItalyEPP
For
ItalyGUE/NGL
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en