Vote in the European Parliament

Combating VAT fraud – the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation when it comes to VAT fraud and its impact on the EU budget

Ondřej Knotek – § 22 – Am 2
Date: 20.10.2026·Reference: A10-0213/2026
Rapporteur: Ondřej Knotek

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 193 For
  • 454 Against
  • 11 Abstention
  • 61 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 2 · Tabled by MembersView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Virginie Joron, Ondřej Knotek, Mieke Andriese, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans, Jordan Bardella, Christophe Bay, Majbritt Birkholm, Rachel Blom, Barbara Bonte, Paolo Borchia, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Tomasz Buczek, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Jaroslav Bžoch, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Marie Dauchy, Valérie Deloge, Tamás Deutsch, Elisabeth Dieringer, Mélanie Disdier, Klara Dostalova, Marieke Ehlers, Anne-Sophie Frigout, Angéline Furet, Kinga Gál, Jean-Paul Garraud, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, Catherine Griset, Enikő Győri, András Gyürk, Roman Haider, Gerald Hauser, György Hölvényi, Jaroslav Knot, Vilis Krištopans, Sebastian Kruis, Tomáš Kubín, András László, Afroditi Latinopoulou, Fabrice Leggeri, Julien Leonardelli, Thierry Mariani, Jorge Martín Frías, Georg Mayer, Tiago Moreira de Sá, Jana Nagyová, Aleksandar Nikolic, Philippe Olivier, Aldo Patriciello, Gilles Pennelle, Pascale Piera, Pierre Pimpie, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová, Julie Rechagneux, André Rougé, Silvia Sardone, Ernő Schaller-Baross, Raffaele Stancanelli, Antonín Staněk, Petra Steger, António Tânger Corrêa, Hermann Tertsch, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Rody Tolassy, Isabella Tovaglieri, Matthieu Valet, Tom Vandendriessche, Alexandre Varaut, Annamária Vicsek, Harald Vilimsky, Séverine Werbrouck, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik

… OLAF and the EPPO for the purposes of cross-border VAT fraud detection; Added: although e-invoicing may be one of the tools used to combat fraud, it should remain voluntary, in particular for SMEs and micro-enterprises, in order to avoid imposing excessive operating costs on them; calls on the Commission to report to Parliament and the Council by …

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE788.349

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (115 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2121(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral354 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage43 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary115 days since this step began
Recorded activities (8)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
ItalyECR
For
FrancePfE
For
HungaryPfE
For
RomaniaECR
For
ItalyECR
For
PolandECR
For
ItalyECR
For
CroatiaECR
For
NetherlandsPfE
For
FrancePfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en