Vote in the European Parliament

2025 Commission report on Serbia

Tonino Picula – § 20 – Am 1
Date: 08.07.2026·Reference: A10-0163/2026
Rapporteur: Tonino Picula

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 113 For
  • 514 Against
  • 22 Abstention
  • 70 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 1 · Tabled by The LeftView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Danilo Della Valle

… and consistently addressing its significant shortcomings, lack of progress and even backsliding; Removed: welcomes the initial improvement made in addressing Serbia’s shortcomings by the Commissioner for Enlargement and the announced suspension of funds earmarked for Serbia over legislative reforms; Added: opposes the suspension of pre-accession funds for Serbia, as this would not weaken the political elite in power, but rather primarily penalise the population, rural areas and the most vulnerable; is concerned that such financial blackmail risks pushing Serbia towards non-European investors, including Chinese state-owned consortia with weaker social and environmental standards; warns against any potential systematic attempts by Serbia to impede the accelerated …

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.390

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (156 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2255(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral78 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage96 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary156 days since this step began
Recorded activities (12)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee report adopted
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Plenary debate
  11. Plenary vote
  12. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Criticism of Serbia’s backsliding on EU reforms.
  • Demand for rule of law and media freedom.
  • Concern over disinformation campaigns and hybrid threats.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
PolandECR
For
ItalyPfE
For
ItalyECR
For
PolandECR
For
PolandECR
For
ItalyGUE/NGL
For
ItalyPfE
For
PolandECR
For
PolandECR
For
LatviaECR
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en