Vote in the European Parliament
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Data Protection Supervisor
Overall Result
Adopted- 528 For
- 59 Against
- 62 Abstention
- 70 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (64 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/2154(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Discharge granted to Data Protection Supervisor for 2024.
- Budget execution rate of 96 % for commitments.
- New AI oversight tasks from 2026 for the EDPS.
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Tabled by Dick Erixon, Nicolas Bay, Charlie Weimers +1 · ECR
Added: 20 a. Deplores the European Data Protection Supervisor’s reprimand of 8 January 2025 to the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) concerning the sharing of operational data on human smuggling networks and irregular migrants with Europol; stresses that the right to data protection under Article 8 of the Charter and the supposed “freedom of movement” of illegal migrants are not absolute and may be limited under Article 52(1) where such limitations are provided for by law and are necessary and proportionate to protect the Union’s external borders and combat cross-border crime, in line with Article 3(2) TEU and Article 67(3), Article 77, Article 79(2), point (c), and Article 87(2), point (a), TFEU; underlines that illegal entrants have only one freedom — the freedom to be deported to their country of origin; recalls that the EDPS audit of October 2022 and report of May 2023 identified shortcomings in systematic debriefing-based transfers without the required assessment, but underlines that Article 90(2), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 does not justify a ban on regular or proactive transfers of operational data and requires only that Frontex show that the transfer is strictly necessary for Europol’s mandate; recalls further that Europol’s mandate under Regulation (EU) 2016/794 covers migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings and that Article 18(2) empowers Europol to carry out cross-checking and operational analysis; calls on the EDPS to immediately reverse its overly restrictive approach, and on Frontex to restore swift, regular and proactive operational data-sharing by establishing clear and workable criteria for the transmission of relevant operational data strictly necessary for Europol’s mandate, in full compliance with Union law;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 66For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 162For
- 2Against
- 0Abstention
- 21Did not vote
- 122For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 13Did not vote
- 43For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 44For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 45For
- 7Against
- 26Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 18For
- 4Against
- 5Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 27For
- 41Against
- 9Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 1For
- 4Against
- 22Abstention
- 0Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |