Abstimmung im Europäischen Parlament

Zeit, die die Europäische Kommission für die Bearbeitung von Anträgen auf Zugang der Öffentlichkeit zu Dokumenten benötigt

Datum: 14.03.2024·Referenz: B9-0162/2024
Berichterstatter/in: Juan Fernando López Aguilar

Gesamtergebnis

Angenommen
  • 535 Dafür
  • 1 Dagegen
  • 1 Enthaltung
  • 168 Nicht abgestimmt
Status und Verfahren

Ergebnis laut Europäischem Parlament.

Abgestimmt am
Zuletzt dokumentierter Schritt
Plenum · (vor 974 Tagen)
Nächster geplanter Schritt
In der Quelle ist kein weiterer Schritt geplant.

Verfahrensverlauf

2023/2941(RSP) · RSP

Dokumentierte Verfahrensschritte. Daraus folgt nicht, dass ein Gesetz in Kraft getreten ist.

  1. Zuletzt dokumentiert: Plenum974 Tage seit Beginn dieses Schritts
Dokumentierte Schritte (2)
  1. Plenarabstimmung
  2. Ergebnisse der Plenarabstimmung
Geplante Schritte (keine Bestätigung der Durchführung)
  1. Plenardebatte
  2. Plenarabstimmung

Verfahrensakte (OEIL) · Daten des Europäischen Parlaments
Abgerufen:

Quellen

Daten: EP Open Data API

Verlauf der Änderungsanträge (14)

Wortlaut wie vom EP veröffentlicht, auf Englisch.

  1. Änderungsantrag 1 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Angenommen

    Paragraph 7 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Marc Botenga · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: 7a. Requests the immediate and full publication of all contracts for the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines financed wholly or partially with public funds;

  2. Änderungsantrag 2 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Angenommen

    Paragraph 10 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Manon Aubry, Marc Botenga · The Left

    Hinzugefügt: 10a. Calls on the Commission to finally and immediately publish the text messages that the President of the Commission and the CEO of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer exchanged during the negotiations on the procurement of 1.8 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly in the light of the unexplained 25 % increase of the price per dose, which resulted in a total cost of EUR 35 billion in public money;

  3. Änderungsantrag 3 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Angenommen

    Paragraph 11

    Eingereicht von Manon Aubry · The Left

    … Parliament will consider using all available parliamentary instruments to address the matter; Hinzugefügt: recalls that Parliament has the right to bring action against the Commission before the Court of Justice of the EU on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties, including Article 15(3) TFEU on the right of EU citizens and residents to access documents;

  4. Änderungsantrag 4 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 11

    Eingereicht von Manon Aubry · The Left

    … by the time the new College of Commissioners is established, Parliament will Entfernt: consider using Hinzugefügt: use all available parliamentary instruments to address the Entfernt: matter; Hinzugefügt: matter and bring action against the Commission before the Court of Justice of the EU for the breach of its obligation to provide access to documents, as enshrined in the Treaties;

  5. Änderungsantrag 5 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Angenommen

    Paragraph 4 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: 4a. Recalls with great concern that, in 2021, following a request for public access to text messages between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company regarding the Commission’s purchase of COVID-19 vaccines, the Commission refused to acknowledge that such text messages fall within the definition of a ‘document’ under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001; recalls that the registration of a document is a consequence of, not a prerequisite for, that document’s existence; takes note of the Ombudsman’s finding of maladministration by the Commission in this case; is concerned by the fact that the Commission has failed to follow up on the Ombudsman’s recommendation following her inquiry to conduct another search for relevant text messages; calls on the Commission to conduct a full search without delay; expresses deep concern about the growing distance between citizens and the EU institutions, which this situation has worsened;

  6. Änderungsantrag 6 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Angenommen

    Paragraph 4 b (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: 4b. Notes with great concern that the Ombudsman has received many citizens’ complaints about extreme delays in gaining access to requested documents; supports the Ombudsman’s views that access delayed is effectively access denied and that administrative processes should be streamlined to ensure that citizens receive access to documents in a timely manner;

  7. Änderungsantrag 7 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Abgelehnt

    Citation 10 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: – having regard to the discharge procedure for the 2021 EU general budget - Commission and executive agencies1a; __________________ 1a Texts Adopted, P9_TA(2023)0137.

  8. Änderungsantrag 8 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Angenommen

    Paragraph 4 c (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: 4c. Recalls that, according to the European Ombudsman, restrictions on access to documents, particularly legislative documents, should be exceptional and limited to what is absolutely necessary; recalls further that any decision denying public access to documents must be based on clearly and strictly defined legal exemptions, accompanied by a reasoned and specific justification, to enable citizens to understand the denial of access and make effective use of the legal remedies available; considers that a more proactive approach would help ensure effective transparency and prevent costly and burdensome legal disputes between citizens and institutions;

  9. Änderungsantrag 9 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 5 b (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: 5b. Condemns the lack of transparency from the Commission and pharmaceutical companies regarding the development, purchase and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines;

  10. Änderungsantrag 10 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 4 d (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: 4d. Notes with concern that, to date, the Commission has not made available the unredacted versions of the contracts signed with the producers of the COVID-19 vaccines, not only to the public, but even to the Members of the European Parliament;

  11. Änderungsantrag 11 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 4 d (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: 4d. Calls on the Commission to publish the unredacted versions of the purchase agreements for the COVID-19 vaccines immediately;

  12. Änderungsantrag 12 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 6 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: 6a. Recalls that, in its resolution on public access to documents – annual report for the years 2019-2021 , Parliament underlined that the Commission had been deleting documents, including minutes of closed meetings, reports and internal documents; expresses its concern about the fact that this practice has led to the disappearance of important correspondence relevant to policy decisions; calls on the Commission to ensure the systematic registration and archiving of non-private correspondence related to key political decisions and spending; _________________________

  13. Änderungsantrag 13 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Abgelehnt

    Paragraph 11 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: 11a. Notes that the European Public Prosecutor’s Office has confirmed that there is an ongoing investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the Union1a; __________________ 1a European Public Prosecutor’s Office, ‘Ongoing EPPO investigation into the acquisition of COVID-19 vaccines in the EU’, 14 October 2022.

  14. Änderungsantrag 14 · Entschließungsantrag B9-0162/2024 (LIBE-Ausschuss)Angenommen

    Paragraph 2 a (new)

    Eingereicht von Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Hinzugefügt: 2a. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s practical recommendations on how to record text and instant messages sent or received by staff members in their professional capacity1a; recognises that work-related text and instant messages are ‘documents’ within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 on public access to documents and invites the other EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies to recognise this, to follow the Ombudsman’s recommendations accordingly and to make this follow-up public; __________________ 1a European Ombudsman, ‘Closing note on the strategic initiative on how EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies record text and instant messages sent/received by staff members in their professional capacity (SI/4/2021/MIG)’, 13 July 2022.

Abstimmung nach Fraktion

So haben die Fraktionen abgestimmt

Mitglieder

Anzeige 10 von 705

Stimmverhalten
NameLandFraktionStimmverhalten
ItalienNI
Dafür
BulgarienRenew
Dafür
DeutschlandEPP
Dafür
ItalienS&D
Dafür
ItalienS&D
Dafür
FrankreichGUE/NGL
Dafür
SpanienGreens/EFA
Dafür
KroatienEPP
Dafür
RumänienRenew
Dafür
TschechienGreens/EFA
Dafür
Mehr anzeigen
Folge uns auf Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en