Data is being updated
Roll-call votes · EU Parliament
How József voted.
Next plenary sitting: 14 September 2026 (in 6 days)
József Szájer
Hungary HUN
Speeches 0
Mandate 2024–2029
Voting Pattern
Loading…
Unable to load stats

József Szájer (EPP, Hungary) — 1818 Roll-call votes · EU Parliament: 177 For (9.7%), 29 Against (1.6%), 17 Abstention (0.9%), 1595 Did not vote (87.7%).

Roll-call votes · EU Parliament

How József voted.

Next plenary sitting: 14 September 2026 (in 6 days)
Motion adopted

2022 discharge: Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (Motion adopted): 552 For, 26 Against, 12 Abstention, 213 Did not vote (803 Members). József Szájer: Did not vote.

11 Apr
2024
11. Apr 2024 · A9-0089/2024
2022 discharge: Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking
A9-0089/2024
My vote Did not vote
For
552
Motion adopted

Geothermal energy (Motion adopted): 531 For, 2 Against, 20 Abstention, 232 Did not vote (785 Members). József Szájer: Did not vote.

18 Jan
2024
18. Jan 2024 · A9-0432/2023
Geothermal energy
A9-0432/2023
My vote Did not vote
For
531
Motion rejected

Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives (Motion rejected): 162 For, 488 Against, 34 Abstention, 156 Did not vote (840 Members). József Szájer: Did not vote.

5 Oct
2021
5. Oct 2021 · B9-0476/2021
Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives
B9-0476/2021
My vote Did not vote
Against
488
Showing 3 of 3