Data is being updated
Roll-call votes · EU Parliament
How Nicola voted.
Next plenary sitting: 14 September 2026 (in 3 days)
Nicola Procaccini
Italy IT
Speeches 100
Mandate 2024–2029
Voting Pattern
Loading…
Unable to load stats

Nicola Procaccini (ECR, Italy) — 2214 Roll-call votes · EU Parliament: 1433 For (64.7%), 312 Against (14.1%), 384 Abstention (17.3%), 85 Did not vote (3.8%).

Roll-call votes · EU Parliament

How Nicola voted.

Next plenary sitting: 14 September 2026 (in 3 days)
Motion adopted

2022 discharge: Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (Motion adopted): 552 For, 26 Against, 12 Abstention, 213 Did not vote (803 Members). Nicola Procaccini: For.

11 Apr
2024
11. Apr 2024 · A9-0089/2024
2022 discharge: Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking
A9-0089/2024
My vote For
For
552
Motion adopted

Geothermal energy (Motion adopted): 531 For, 2 Against, 20 Abstention, 232 Did not vote (785 Members). Nicola Procaccini: Did not vote.

18 Jan
2024
18. Jan 2024 · A9-0432/2023
Geothermal energy
A9-0432/2023
My vote Did not vote
For
531
Motion rejected

Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives (Motion rejected): 162 For, 488 Against, 34 Abstention, 156 Did not vote (840 Members). Nicola Procaccini: For.

5 Oct
2021
5. Oct 2021 · B9-0476/2021
Commission Delegated Regulation supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives
B9-0476/2021
My vote For
Against
488
Showing 3 of 3