Vote in the European Parliament
The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins
Date: 20.05.2026Reference: A10-0120/2026marine ecosystemsustainable developmentaquaculturemarine environmentEU waterscoastal protectionarea managementfishery managementcoastal regionEU environmental policy
Overall Result
- 114 For
- 447 Against
- 81 Abstention
- 75 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Rejected
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Uneven implementation of maritime spatial planning in the EU.
- Fisheries and aquaculture threatened by spatial competition and restrictions .
- Call for binding fishing zones and improved data basis.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For2
- 2For
- 68Against
- 1Abstention
- 6Did not vote
For48
- 48For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For13
- 13For
- 8Against
- 5Abstention
- 4Did not vote
For41
- 41For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
For3
- 3For
- 72Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 22Against
- 2Abstention
- 2Did not vote
For4
- 4For
- 110Against
- 7Abstention
- 15Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 149Against
- 5Abstention
- 28Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 17Against
- 61Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 717
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |