Vote in the European Parliament
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as regards a shorter settlement cycle in the Union
Date: 10.09.2025Reference: A10-0095/2025securitiescapital marketliquidity controlfinancial legislationfinancial transactionfinancial instrumentfinancial institutionsales agentfinancial control
Overall Result
- 612 For
- 7 Against
- 45 Abstention
- 55 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Adopted
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- T+1 settlement cycle for securities mandatory from 2027 .
- Exceptions for securities financing transactions and Lombard loans.
- ESMA to monitor risks during transition.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For18
- 18For
- 3Against
- 9Abstention
- 0Did not vote
For79
- 79For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For72
- 72For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
For67
- 67For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
For48
- 48For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For176
- 176For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
For127
- 127For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
For25
- 25For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
For0
- 0For
- 1Against
- 36Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |