EN
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism
Date: 22.06.2022Reference: A9-0160/2022For141
- 141 For
- 466 Against
- 8 Abstention
- 90 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
RejectedThe Parliament recorded no outcome; this is derived from the vote count.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
P9_PV(2022)06-22(RCV)
- Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism („CBAM“) against carbon leakage .
- Gradual inclusion by 2030 for affected sectors.
- Oversight by new CBAM authority from 2023 .
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Renew Europe (Renew)For2
- 2
- 90
- 1
- 10
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For9
- 9
- 116
- 0
- 20
Non-attached Members (NI)For81
- 81
- 68
- 6
- 32
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For30
- 30
- 0
- 0
- 1
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For18
- 18
- 5
- 0
- 5
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For1
- 1
- 10
- 1
- 1
European People's Party (EPP)For0
- 0
- 159
- 0
- 17
Identity and Democracy (ID)For0
- 0
- 18
- 0
- 4
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Denmark | Renew | For | |
 Austria | S&D | For | |
 Netherlands | NI | For | |
 Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
| Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Sweden | Greens/EFA | For | |
 France | NI | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For | |
 Latvia | NI | For | |
 Italy | NI | For |
