EN
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism
Date: 22.06.2022Reference: A9-0160/2022For124
- 124 For
- 478 Against
- 22 Abstention
- 81 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
RejectedThe Parliament recorded no outcome; this is derived from the vote count.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
P9_PV(2022)06-22(RCV)
- Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism („CBAM“) against carbon leakage .
- Gradual inclusion by 2030 for affected sectors.
- Oversight by new CBAM authority from 2023 .
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For22
- 22
- 1
- 0
- 5
Non-attached Members (NI)For73
- 73
- 73
- 10
- 31
Identity and Democracy (ID)For13
- 13
- 1
- 5
- 3
European People's Party (EPP)For10
- 10
- 150
- 0
- 16
Renew Europe (Renew)For4
- 4
- 86
- 6
- 7
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For1
- 1
- 11
- 0
- 1
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For1
- 1
- 126
- 1
- 17
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For0
- 0
- 30
- 0
- 1
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Czechia | ECR | For | |
 Poland | NI | For | |
| Poland | NI | For | |
 Italy | ECR | For | |
 France | PfE | For | |
| Italy | EPP | For | |
| France | PfE | For | |
 Belgium | ECR | For | |
 Latvia | NI | For | |
 Germany | EPP | For |
