About
Logo

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

Date: 21.01.2026

international security strategic partnership (EU) transatlantic relations Palestine question the EU's international role international cooperation common foreign and security policy activity report multilateral relations Russo-Ukrainian issue

EuroVoc Topics

×
international security strategic partnership (EU) transatlantic relations Palestine question the EU's international role international cooperation common foreign and security policy activity report multilateral relations Russo-Ukrainian issue
← Previous
Overall Result
115
421
113
86
115 For
421 Against
113 Abstention
86 Did not vote
Next →
The report assesses the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) implementation in 2025, emphasizing the defense of the rules-based international order against authoritarian threats. Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine is condemned as a grave violation of international law and European security. The EU is urged to enhance support for Ukraine, including military aid and long-term security guarantees, to achieve a just peace. Strengthening European defense capabilities and countering hybrid threats like disinformation and sabotage are prioritized. The report also calls for expanding geopolitical partnerships, such as with Latin America and Central Asia, to bolster global stability and EU interests.

Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Amendments
Adopted For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – Paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, after point b – Am 5
Rejected For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 4 – Am 6
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 8 – Am 53
Adopted For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 13 – Am 8
Adopted For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 14/3
Rejected For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 15 – Am 9
Rejected For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 15 – Am 11
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 15 – Am 13
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 15 – Am 14
Rejected For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 17 – Am 65
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 20 – Am 16
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 27 – Am 77
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 34 – Am 19
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 34 – Am 22
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 34 – Am 23
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 34 – Am 56
Adopted For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 41
Adopted For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 42 – Am 26
Rejected For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 51 – Am 67
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 58 – Am 27
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 60 – Am 81
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 69 – Am 68
Rejected For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 75 – Am 69
Rejected Abstention
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 76 – Am 28
Rejected For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 76 – Am 33
Adopted Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 77 – Am 82
Rejected Abstention
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 78 – Am 36
Rejected For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 78 – Am 37
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 78 – Am 39
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 89 – Am 40
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 91 – Am 41D
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 92 – Am 84
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 93 – Am 61
Adopted For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 93/2
Rejected For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – Recital S – Am 63
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – Recital U – Am 71
Rejected Against
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – Recital AJ – Am 64
Adopted For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – Recital AJ
Adopted For
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Elisabeth Grossmann
Foto von Elisabeth Grossmann
Country: Austria Austria

Group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)

Plenary contributions: 31
My vote:
Against
GUE/NGL The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)
40 For
0 Against
0 Abstention
7 Did not vote
Click for details
S&D Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
12 For
108 Against
0 Abstention
19 Did not vote
Click for details
NI Non-attached Members (NI)
17 For
7 Against
2 Abstention
5 Did not vote
Click for details
EPP European People's Party (EPP)
14 For
153 Against
3 Abstention
22 Did not vote
Click for details
ESN Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)
5 For
19 Against
2 Abstention
1 Did not vote
Click for details
ECR European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
13 For
51 Against
4 Abstention
11 Did not vote
Click for details
Greens/EFA Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
12 For
1 Against
38 Abstention
2 Did not vote
Click for details
PfE Patriots for Europe (PfE)
2 For
15 Against
63 Abstention
11 Did not vote
Click for details
Renew Renew Europe (Renew)
0 For
67 Against
1 Abstention
8 Did not vote
Click for details
← Go back