Implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products

Date: 16.12.2025 · Reference: A10-0254/2025

protective clause agricultural trade cooperation policy interim agreement (EU) trade agreement cooperation agreement (EU) tariff policy trade agreement (EU) trade policy Mercosur

EuroVoc Topics

×
protective clause agricultural trade cooperation policy interim agreement (EU) trade agreement cooperation agreement (EU) tariff policy trade agreement (EU) trade policy Mercosur
Overall Result: 366 Against
264 For
366 Against
22 Abstention
67 Did not vote
← Previous Next →
Amendment — You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.
← Back to Main Vote
Report Summary
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)
This regulation establishes a bilateral safeguard clause for agricultural products under the EU-MERCOSUR agreement. Its aim is to protect sensitive agricultural sectors from market disruptions caused by increased imports from Mercosur countries. The Commission is required to continuously monitor imports of sensitive products and submit quarterly reports. Thresholds for triggering safeguard measures have been lowered to enable faster responses to price pressures or volume increases. Politically, this seeks to strengthen confidence in the trade agreement and ensure fair competition.
Amendments
Rejected
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – After Article 1 – Am 74
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 2 – § 1 – point 3 – after point ii – Am 19
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 2 – § 1 – point 3 – after point iii – Am 20
Adopted Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 2 – § 1 – point 5 – Am 21= 82=
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 2 – § 1 – point 10 – Am 22D
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 2 – § 1 – point 10 – point i – Am 75
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 3 – § 1 – Am 23
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 3 – § 1 – Am 24D
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 3 – § 1 – Am 70
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 3 – § 1 – Am 25= 55=
Adopted Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 3 – § 1 – Am 83
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 3 – § 2 – after point c – Am 26
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 3 – § 2 – after point c – Am 76
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 3 – after § 2 – Am 27
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 4 – § 1 – Am 57
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 4 – after § 2 – Am 58
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 4 – after § 3 – Am 42
Rejected
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 5 – § 1 – Am 28
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 5 – § 1 – Am 29
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 6 – § 2 – Am 30
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 6 – § 4 – Am 61
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 6 – after § 4 – Am 84
Rejected For
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 7 – § 5 – Am 62
Rejected
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 7 – § 5 – Am 33
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 9 – § 1 – before point a – Am 85
Adopted Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 9 – § 1 – after point b – Am 34= 86=
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 9 – § 1 – point c – Am 35D
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 9 – after § 7 – Am 80
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – After Article 9 – Am 77
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – After Article 9 – Am 45
Adopted Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 11 – § 1 – Am 36= 87=
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 11 – § 3 – Am 37D= 46D=
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 12 – § 7 – Am 50D
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – After Article 12 – Am 38
Adopted For
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – After Article 12 – Am 64= 88=
Rejected For
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 14 – § 3 – Am 66
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 14 – after § 3 – Am 51
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Article 14 – after § 5 – Am 67
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – After Article 19 – Am 71
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Recital 2 – Am 52
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Recital 2 – Am 18
Adopted Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Recital 2 – Am 81
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – After recital 2 – Am 69
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Recital 4 – Am 39
Adopted For
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Commission proposal
Rejected Against
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Proposal to vote on amendments
Adopted For
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – Provisional agreement – Am 89
Lukas Sieper
Foto von Lukas Sieper
Country: Germany Germany

Group: NI Non-attached Members (NI)

Speeches: 490
My vote:
Did not vote
NI Non-attached Members (NI)
18
4
4
4
Click for details
Greens/EFA Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
45
0
3
5
Click for details
PfE Patriots for Europe (PfE)
75
0
0
10
Click for details
Renew Renew Europe (Renew)
5
62
0
8
Click for details
EPP European People's Party (EPP)
20
152
1
15
Click for details
ECR European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
31
44
0
4
Click for details
S&D Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
21
102
0
13
Click for details
GUE/NGL The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)
42
0
0
4
Click for details
ESN Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)
7
2
14
4
Click for details
← Go back