About
Logo

Proposal for a Council decision determining, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

Date: 25.11.2025

fundamental rights infringement of EU law institutional balance (EU) independence of the judiciary rule of law sanction (EU) Hungary democracy
Overall Result
177
451
92
177 For
451 Against
15 Abstention
92 Did not vote
This report assesses the risk of a serious breach of EU fundamental values such as democracy, the rule of law, and human rights by Hungary. Key issues include systemic deficiencies in the judiciary, anti-corruption measures, and academic freedom that remain unresolved. The political aim is to restore compliance with EU standards and unlock frozen EU funds. The document highlights Hungary’s failure to implement EU recommendations and rulings from international courts. The goal is to increase pressure on Hungary to enact essential reforms.
Amendments
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – After § 1 – Am 8
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 2 – Am 9
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 2
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – After § 2 – Am 10
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 4 – Am 11
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 4
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 7 – Am 12
Rejected For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 9 – Am 2
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 10 – Am 13
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 12 – Am 14
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 13 – Am 15
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 13
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 19
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 22
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 24
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 27/1
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 27/2
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 28 – Am 17
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – § 28
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital E – Am 4
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – After recital H – Am 6
Rejected Against
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – After recital J – Am 7
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital AK
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital AP
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BD/1
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BD/2
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BE/1
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BE/2
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BE/3
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BF
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BG
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BH/1
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BH/2
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BI
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BJ/1
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BJ/2
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BK
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Recital BP
Adopted For
A10-0231/2025 – Tineke Strik – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Lukas Sieper
Foto von Lukas Sieper
Country: Germany Germany

Group: NI Non-attached Members (NI)

Plenary contributions: 532
My vote:
Against
← Go back