Español
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on the implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report
Date: 15.01.2020Reference: A9-0052/2019For185
- 185 For
- 425 Against
- 92 Abstention
- 46 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
RejectedThe Parliament recorded no outcome; this is derived from the vote count.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
P9_PV(2020)01-15(RCV)
- Demand for EU strategic autonomy in security policy.
- Criticism of insufficient decision-making and interoperability in CSDP.
- Emphasis on NATO cooperation despite autonomous EU structures.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For25
- 25
- 0
- 2
- 1
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For75
- 75
- 49
- 19
- 10
Non-attached Members (NI)For80
- 80
- 75
- 50
- 14
Renew Europe (Renew)For3
- 3
- 100
- 1
- 4
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For1
- 1
- 2
- 10
- 0
European People's Party (EPP)For1
- 1
- 167
- 0
- 13
Identity and Democracy (ID)For0
- 0
- 10
- 9
- 4
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For0
- 0
- 22
- 1
- 0
Members
Showing 10 of 748
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Portugal | S&D | For | |
 Italy | NI | For | |
 Lithuania | NI | For | |
 United Kingdom | NI | For | |
 Denmark | NI | For | |
| Italy | NI | For | |
 Slovakia | S&D | For | |
| Germany | NI | For | |
| United Kingdom | S&D | For |
