Vote in the European Parliament
2022 discharge: General budget of the EU - Court of Justice of the European Union
Luke Ming Flanagan - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)
Date: 11.04.2024Reference: A9-0075/2024financial yeargeneral budget (EU)financial controlCourt of Justice of the European Unionbudgetary dischargeauditadministration of the Institutions
Overall Result
- 525 For
- 69 Against
- 9 Abstention
- 102 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Adopted
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Parliament grants discharge for 2022 ECJ budget .
- Audit by Court of Auditors found error rate below materiality threshold .
- Emphasis on transparency, digitalisation and sustainability of ECJ.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For108
- 108For
- 38Against
- 6Abstention
- 33Did not vote
For118
- 118For
- 3Against
- 1Abstention
- 17Did not vote
For94
- 94For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
For19
- 19For
- 6Against
- 1Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For148
- 148For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 28Did not vote
For27
- 27For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
For11
- 11For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
For0
- 0For
- 22Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |