Vote in the European Parliament
Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)
Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip - Amendements de la commission compétente - vote séparé - Am 145
Date: 12.03.2024Reference: A9-0056/2024advertising malpracticeharmonisation of standardsauditconsumer lawgreenwashingsustainable productgreen economyconsumer informationeco-labelenvironmental standardenvironmental impactgreen marketing
Overall Result
- 454 For
- 110 Against
- 44 Abstention
- 97 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Adopted
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Directive on environmental claims to prevent greenwashing .
- Consumers receive reliable, comparable environmental information.
- SMEs receive support for implementing requirements.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For122
- 122For
- 4Against
- 0Abstention
- 14Did not vote
For152
- 152For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 26Did not vote
For64
- 64For
- 61Against
- 29Abstention
- 29Did not vote
For86
- 86For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 15Did not vote
For15
- 15For
- 1Against
- 10Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For14
- 14For
- 4Against
- 4Abstention
- 3Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 10Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
For0
- 0For
- 30Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |