Vote au Parlement européen

Rapports 2023 et 2024 de la Commission sur l'Ukraine

Michael Gahler - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)
Date: 09.09.2025·Référence: A10-0154/2025
Rapporteur: Michael Gahler

Résultat global

Adopté
  • 418 Pour
  • 135 Contre
  • 41 Abstention
  • 125 N'a pas voté
Statut et procédure

Résultat tel qu'enregistré par le Parlement européen.

Vote du
Dernière étape documentée
Plénière · (il y a 477 jours)
Prochaine étape prévue
Aucune autre étape n'est prévue dans la source.

Déroulement de la procédure

2025/2026(INI) · INI

Activités documentées de la procédure. Elles ne prouvent pas qu’une loi est entrée en vigueur.

  1. Documenté: Renvoi105 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  2. Documenté: Examen en commission77 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  3. Dernier documenté: Plénière477 jours depuis le début de cette étape
Activités documentées (18)
  1. Renvoi en commission
  2. Dépôt du rapport en commission
  3. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  4. Adoption du rapport en commission
  5. Dépôt en séance plénière
  6. Dépôt en séance plénière
  7. Dépôt en séance plénière
  8. Dépôt en séance plénière
  9. Dépôt en séance plénière
  10. Dépôt en séance plénière
  11. Dépôt en séance plénière
  12. Dépôt en séance plénière
  13. Dépôt en séance plénière
  14. Dépôt en séance plénière
  15. Dépôt en séance plénière
  16. Débat en séance plénière
  17. Vote en séance plénière
  18. Résultats du vote en séance plénière
Activités prévues (réalisation non confirmée)
  1. Débat en séance plénière
  2. Vote en séance plénière

Fiche de procédure (OEIL) · Données du Parlement européen
Consulté le:

Sources

Données : EP Open Data API

De quoi s’agit-il ?

  • Les députés réaffirment leur engagement inconditionnel en faveur de l’indépendance, de la souveraineté et de l’intégrité territoriale de l’Ukraine
  • La Commission européenne devrait ouvrir des pôles de négociation pour faire progresser la candidature du pays à l’adhésion à l’UE au rythme le plus rapide possible
  • L'UE et ses États membres doivent rester les alliés stratégiques de l'Ukraine
Source : EP Press Room — 9 septembre 2025

Historique des amendements (7)

Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.

  1. Amendement 1Rejeté

    Recital AA a (new)

    Déposé par Danilo Della Valle · The Left

    Ajouté: AAa. whereas there is a growing number of violations of fundamental rights documented in Ukraine, with activists, political opponents and journalists critical of the Ukrainian Government being repressed; whereas there have been arbitrary arrests, cases of judicial persecution and restrictions on freedom of the press and freedom of expression; whereas extraordinary laws are being used to silence dissent and permanently suppress even the slightest form of democratic pluralism; whereas it is becoming more and more common to see serious violations of personal freedoms during forced demonstrations on the country’s streets;

  2. Amendement 3Adopté

    Recital W a (new)

    Déposé par Özlem Demirel, Jonas Sjöstedt · The Left

    Ajouté: Wa. Whereas the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) has raised serious concerns regarding the deterioration of labour rights in Ukraine, including violations of trade union freedoms and social dialogue; whereas freedom of association, collective bargaining, and the right to strike are protected under International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions to which Ukraine is a party, and are key elements of the EU acquis and the Copenhagen criteria;

  3. Amendement 4Adopté

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Déposé par Özlem Demirel · The Left

    Ajouté: 1a. Regrets the EU’s militaristic strategy in Ukraine, which has failed to secure peace and undermined the EU’s global relevance; demands an urgent shift in EU policy toward diplomacy and civilian protection, putting peace and conflict resolution above military escalation; calls on the EU to finally open negotiation channels to achieve a political solution to the conflict in Ukraine, in response to the need for collective security and disarmament in Europe and compliance with the principles of the UN Charter and the Final Act of the Helsinki Conference;

  4. Amendement 5Rejeté

    Paragraph 45 a (new)

    Déposé par Özlem Demirel, Jonas Sjöstedt · The Left

    Ajouté: 45a. Expresses deep concern about reports of state interference in trade union affairs, including attempts to seize union property and to delegitimise representative organisations; urges the Ukrainian government to refrain from any actions that threaten trade union independence and to guarantee full legal protection against anti-union practices; calls on the Ukrainian authorities to immediately lift all restrictions on trade union leader Grigoriy Osovyi and ensure that no trade unionist is subject to judicial harassment, arbitrary detention or state repression; urges the Commission and the EEAS to actively monitor the state of labour rights in Ukraine, in close cooperation with the ETUC and the ILO;

  5. Amendement 6Rejeté

    Paragraph 65 a (new)

    Déposé par Kinga Gál, António Tânger Corrêa, Georg Mayer +1 · PfE

    Ajouté: 65a. Considers it unacceptable that Ukraine deliberately targeted the Druzhba oil pipeline, being fully aware of its indispensable role for the energy security of Hungary and Slovakia; states that these attacks do not primarily harm the Russian Federation, but rather undermine the security, welfare and economic stability of Hungary and Slovakia, members of the very community that Ukraine is eager to join; recalls that in its statement of 27 January 2025, the Commission stated that the ‘integrity of the energy infrastructure supplying EU Member States is a matter of EU security. The Commission expects all third countries to respect this and is ready to take measures to protect critical energy infrastructure such as electricity cables and oil and gas pipeline or facilities’; in this context, expresses grave concern regarding the continued silence and inaction of the Commission in the face of recent actions by Ukraine that deliberately threaten the energy infrastructure of Member States, notably Hungary and Slovakia; emphasises that the lack of meaningful response may be interpreted as the Commission’s alignment with a third country against its own Member States in a matter of national sovereignty and security; calls on the Commission to take immediate measures to protect critical energy infrastructure, in line with its aforementioned statement; urges the Commission to clarify its position on these attacks; stresses that Member States cannot be left vulnerable on account of political considerations;

  6. Amendement 39Rejeté

    Recital Q a (new)

    Déposé par Petar Volgin, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff +1 · ESN

    Ajouté: Qa. whereas on 20 August 2024, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted a law targeting various religious organisations, including the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), the largest Christian denomination in Ukraine by number of parishes and clergy, and recognised by most practising Ukrainian believers; whereas this legislation, justified by the Ukrainian authorities on national security grounds owing to alleged links between the UOC and the Russian Federation, prompted serious concerns about its compatibility with fundamental human rights, notably the right to freedom of religion; whereas the adoption of this law has provoked significant public controversy and may risk deepening societal divisions in Ukraine;

  7. Amendement 44Rejeté

    Paragraph 43 a (new)

    Déposé par Petar Volgin, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff +1 · ESN

    Ajouté: 43a. Strongly condemns the ongoing campaign of state pressure against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, including the detention and intimidation of clergy, closure of places of worship, and the adoption of legislation aimed at banning or severely restricting its activities; stresses that such targeted repression of a major religious community has no place in a country aspiring to join the EU; insists that Ukraine immediately cease discriminatory measures under the guise of national security and fully align its practices with international human rights obligations;

Vote par groupe politique

Comment les groupes politiques ont voté

Les membres

Montrer 10 de 719

Position de vote
NomPaysGroupePosition de vote
ItalieECR
Pour
BelgiqueS&D
Pour
DanemarkRenew
Pour
PologneECR
Pour
AllemagneNI
Pour
PologneECR
Pour
TchéquieGreens/EFA
Pour
ItalieECR
Pour
PortugalEPP
Pour
FinlandeEPP
Pour
Afficher plus
Suivez-nous sur Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en