Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Proyecto piloto sobre las Alianzas de Escuelas Europeas

Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 08.10.2026·Referencia: B10-0436/2026
Ponente: Nela Riehl

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 443 A favor
  • 98 En contra
  • 47 Abstención
  • 131 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 38 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2026/2713(RSP) · RSP

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Último documentado: Pleno38 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (4)
  1. Presentación al pleno
  2. Debate en el pleno
  3. Votación en el pleno
  4. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Debate en el pleno
  2. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

Historial de enmiendas (9)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 1 · Propuesta de Resolución B10-0436/2026 (CULT)Rechazada

    Recital B a (new)

    Presentada por Marc Jongen · ESN

    Añadido: Ba. whereas the EU must fully respect the responsibility of the Member States for the organisation of their education systems and their teaching content, as well as their linguistic diversity and cultural traditions;

  2. Enmienda 2 · Propuesta de Resolución B10-0436/2026 (CULT)Rechazada

    Recital I a (new)

    Presentada por Marc Jongen · ESN

    Añadido: Ia. whereas it is the right of parents to ensure education and teaching in conformity with their own religious and ethical convictions;

  3. Enmienda 3 · Propuesta de Resolución B10-0436/2026 (CULT)Rechazada

    Recital I b (new)

    Presentada por Marc Jongen · ESN

    Añadido: Ib. whereas the preservation and transmission of Europe’s cultural heritage to future generations, including its Christian heritage, must be an important objective of education;

  4. Enmienda 4 · Propuesta de Resolución B10-0436/2026 (CULT)Rechazada

    Paragraph 3

    Presentada por Marc Jongen · ESN

    3. Calls on the Commission to ensure that citizenship Eliminado: education, democratic competences, media literacy, critical thinking and knowledge of the EU and its values are integral components of the pilot, including through participatory and experiential learning approaches that enable pupils to engage actively with democratic processes and European cooperation; Añadido: education under the European Schools Alliances remains politically pluralistic and respects the right of pupils to develop independent and critical judgements;

  5. Enmienda 5 · Propuesta de Resolución B10-0436/2026 (CULT)Rechazada

    Paragraph 3 a (new)

    Presentada por Marc Jongen · ESN

    Añadido: 3a. Urges the Commission to ensure that the European Schools Alliances fully respect parents’ rights to determine the religious, moral and pedagogical upbringings of their children, and that EU-funded educational initiatives, in particular regarding sexuality education, do not impose ideological or political approaches, including gender-related concepts, that disregard parental convictions;

  6. Enmienda 6 · Propuesta de Resolución B10-0436/2026 (CULT)Rechazada

    Paragraph 6

    Presentada por Marc Jongen · ESN

    … peer learning, digital cooperation and the exchange of innovative and inclusive teaching Eliminado: practices, as well as to help make mobility a more regular and sustainable feature of school education in line with the objectives of the Council Recommendation ‘Europe on the Move’; Añadido: practices; demands that student exchanges under the European Schools Alliances are limited to the 27 Member States of the European Union and the European Economic Area countries Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, and do not extend to other non-EU countries;

  7. Enmienda 7 · Propuesta de Resolución B10-0436/2026 (CULT)Rechazada

    Paragraph 6 a (new)

    Presentada por Marc Jongen · ESN

    Añadido: 6a. Calls on the Commission to place the acquisition of solid subject knowledge and foundational skills, including literacy and numeracy, at the centre of its educational initiatives, recognising that well-founded knowledge is the basis for developing higher-order competences, critical thinking and independent judgement, and to strengthen natural sciences, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), as well as links between STEM education and vocational training, as essential foundations for Europe’s economic competitiveness, technological sovereignty and capacity for innovation in key future technologies;

  8. Enmienda 8 · Propuesta de Resolución B10-0436/2026 (CULT)Rechazada

    Paragraph 6 b (new)

    Presentada por Marc Jongen · ESN

    Añadido: 6b. Calls on the Commission to support educational approaches that preserve and promote the study of classical languages, literature, philosophy and history, recognising their contribution to linguistic proficiency, logical reasoning, historical understanding and critical thought, and to ensure that the European Schools Alliances contribute to safeguarding Europe’s classical intellectual and cultural heritage;

  9. Enmienda 9 · Propuesta de Resolución B10-0436/2026 (CULT)Rechazada

    Paragraph 8

    Presentada por Marc Jongen · ESN

    … and regional partnership plans, the European Social Fund Plus, and the Youth Eliminado: Guarantee, in order to generate stronger cooperation partnerships, including mobility activities, improved educational outcomes, stronger basic skills, innovation in teaching and learning, social inclusion, democratic resilience, better preparation for future skills needs, and effective teacher professional development; Añadido: Guarantee; calls on the Commission to ensure that any new structures established under the European Schools Alliances provide clear and demonstrable added value compared with existing Erasmus+ instruments, are cost-efficient and respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, avoiding unnecessary duplication and administrative burdens;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
ItaliaGUE/NGL
A favor
Países BajosGreens/EFA
A favor
EspañaEPP
A favor
CroaciaEPP
A favor
EstoniaS&D
A favor
AlemaniaS&D
A favor
FinlandiaEPP
A favor
AustriaS&D
A favor
CroaciaEPP
A favor
AlemaniaS&D
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en