Votación en el Parlamento Europeo
Guerra híbrida y protección de la integridad territorial y las infraestructuras críticas de seguridad y defensa de la Unión
Resultado general
Aprobada- 470 A favor
- 129 En contra
- 62 Abstención
- 56 No votó
Cómo contamos
- Los votos A favor, En contra y Abstención provienen del acta de votación nominal del Parlamento Europeo.
- «No ha votado» se deriva: eurodiputados con mandato el día de la votación para los que no se registró ningún voto. Las abstenciones no cuentan para esto.
- Las correcciones de voto posteriores se muestran pero no cambian el resultado oficial.
- Cada votación (votación global, enmienda, votación parcial) cuenta por separado. Por eso los totales pueden diferir de páginas que cuentan de forma distinta.
Estado y procedimiento
Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.
- Votación celebrada el
- Último paso documentado
- Pleno · (hace 116 días)
- Próximo paso previsto
- La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Desarrollo del procedimiento
2026/2024(INI) · INI
Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.
- Documentado: Remisión
- Documentado: Examen en comisión
- Último documentado: Pleno
Actividades documentadas (10)
- Remisión a comisión
- Presentación del informe en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Aprobación del informe en comisión
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
- Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:
Fuentes
Datos: EP Open Data API
Historial de enmiendas (7)
Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.
- Enmienda 6Rechazada
Recital F a (new)
Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gerolf Annemans, Barbara Bonte +78 · MEPs
Añadido: Fa. whereas hybrid threats against the EU are not limited to its eastern flank, but also directly affect its southern flank, including the Mediterranean, North Africa, the Sahel and the external borders of southern Member States; whereas the security of the EU’s southern flank is inseparable from the territorial integrity, sovereignty and national security of the Member States concerned;
- Enmienda 7Rechazada
Paragraph 35
Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gerolf Annemans, Barbara Bonte +78 · MEPs
… the space domain into the EU’s broader framework for countering hybrid threats; Añadido: points out that the effective protection of the EU’s external borders is also an essential element for safeguarding the security, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Member States against hybrid threats, including those involving the instrumentalisation of illegal immigration;
- Enmienda 8Rechazada
Paragraph 56
Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gerolf Annemans, Barbara Bonte +78 · MEPs
… is required, which depends on common frameworks, methodologies, taxonomies and operational standards; Añadido: considers that any common definition of hybrid warfare should cover sabotage, related activities and the instrumentalisation of illegal immigration flows by third countries or hostile actors, in accordance with precedents already recognised by the EU institutions in relation to hybrid attacks against the EU’s external borders; highlights the need to combine diplomatic, legal, economic and restrictive measures to …
- Enmienda 9Rechazada
Paragraph 64
Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gerolf Annemans, Barbara Bonte +78 · MEPs
… order to destabilise a Member State or put pressure on the EU;
Eliminado: notes the specificAñadido: considers the new provisions on the instrumentalisation of migration recently included inEliminado: key pieces of EU legislation;Añadido: EU legislation to be manifestly insufficient; calls for their urgent review in order to ensure that Member States facing hybrid attacks involving the instrumentalisation of illegal immigration are able to ensure the immediate and effective return of those instrumentalised persons; notes the Commission’s announced revision of the mandate for Frontex; underlines that … required, which would also help strengthen the EU’s response to hybrid threats; Añadido: calls on the Member States to strengthen the effective control of their external borders and cooperation between police, intelligence, customs and border guard services, and to reinforce their operational capacity to detect, prevent and respond to coordinated actions aimed at provoking or exploiting illegal immigration crises as part of hybrid operations; - Enmienda 10Rechazada
Paragraph 64 a (new)
Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gerolf Annemans, Barbara Bonte +70 · MEPs
Añadido: 64a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to suspend EU funding, financial assistance and preferential financing to any third country or organisation whose administration deliberately encourages, facilitates, directs or instrumentalises illegal immigration flows as part of a hybrid attack against a Member State; considers that, in the light of the events of 30 and 31 July 2026 in the Spanish city of Ceuta, the Commission should urgently review all EU funding provided to Morocco for migration management and border control;
- Enmienda 11Rechazada
Paragraph 64 b (new)
Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gerolf Annemans, Barbara Bonte +77 · MEPs
Añadido: 64b. Expresses its utmost concern at the events of 30 and 31 July 2026 in Ceuta, a Spanish city forming part of the EU’s external border; notes with grave concern the findings of a report by the intelligence unit of the Spanish National Police responsible for immigration and border matters, submitted to the competent judicial authority, according to which the mass breach of the Spanish and EU external border was not a spontaneous migratory event but a planned operation, carried out under the pretence of a migration crisis; stresses the need to recognise the deliberate instrumentalisation of illegal immigration by non-EU state actors for the purpose of overwhelming a Member State’s border control capacity as a particularly serious form of hybrid operation against its sovereignty, security and territorial integrity; calls on the Commission, the Council and the High Representative to assess without delay the findings of the Spanish authorities and, should they be confirmed, to adopt appropriate diplomatic, financial and restrictive measures against those responsible;
- Enmienda 12Rechazada
Paragraph 64 c (new)
Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gerolf Annemans, Barbara Bonte +78 · MEPs
Añadido: 64c. Condemns the activities of non-governmental organisations and other entities that knowingly facilitate, encourage or assist illegal immigration towards the external borders of Member States, particularly where such activities contribute to, support or are exploited as part of hybrid operations aimed at destabilising a Member State; considers it unacceptable that organisations engaging in such activities should benefit from public funding; calls on the Commission to immediately suspend EU funding to any organisation or entity found to have knowingly facilitated or participated in such activities, to recover funds already granted where legally possible and to ensure that such organisations are excluded from future EU funding;
Voto por grupo político
Cómo votaron los grupos políticos
- 70A favor
- 0En contra
- 2Abstención
- 6No votó
- 171A favor
- 0En contra
- 1Abstención
- 12No votó
- 122A favor
- 2En contra
- 4Abstención
- 7No votó
- 37A favor
- 0En contra
- 11Abstención
- 5No votó
- 54A favor
- 6En contra
- 15Abstención
- 9No votó
- 3A favor
- 54En contra
- 20Abstención
- 7No votó
- 9A favor
- 23En contra
- 5Abstención
- 7No votó
- 3A favor
- 20En contra
- 4Abstención
- 1No votó
- 1A favor
- 24En contra
- 0Abstención
- 2No votó
Miembros
Mostrando 10 de 717
| Nombre | País | Grupo | Posición de voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor |