Votación en el Parlamento Europeo
Reglamento Delegado de la Comisión por el que se modifica el Reglamento Delegado (UE) 2019/807 de la Comisión con el fin de introducir una trayectoria para reducir gradualmente la contribución de los biocarburantes, biolíquidos o combustibles de biomasa con riesgo elevado de provocar un cambio indirecto del uso de la tierra hasta alcanzar los objetivos en materia de energías renovables
Resultado general
Aprobada- 388 A favor
- 248 En contra
- 24 Abstención
- 59 No votó
Cómo contamos
- Los votos A favor, En contra y Abstención provienen del acta de votación nominal del Parlamento Europeo.
- «No ha votado» se deriva: eurodiputados con mandato el día de la votación para los que no se registró ningún voto. Las abstenciones no cuentan para esto.
- Las correcciones de voto posteriores se muestran pero no cambian el resultado oficial.
- Cada votación (votación global, enmienda, votación parcial) cuenta por separado. Por eso los totales pueden diferir de páginas que cuentan de forma distinta.
Estado y procedimiento
Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.
- Votación celebrada el
- Último paso documentado
- Pleno · (hace 133 días)
- Próximo paso previsto
- La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Desarrollo del procedimiento
2026/2680(DEA) · DEA
Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.
- Documentado: Remisión
- Último documentado: Pleno
Actividades documentadas (4)
- Remisión a comisión
- Presentación al pleno
- Votación en el pleno
- Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
- Votación en el pleno
Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:
Fuentes
Datos: EP Open Data API
¿De qué se trata?
- Crítica a la clasificación de la soja como materia prima de alto riesgo
- Exigencia de año base 2008 en evaluación iLUC
- Advertencia sobre impactos económicos en el sector europeo
Historial de enmiendas (7)
Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.
Recital B
Presentada por Paolo Borchia, Raffaele Stancanelli, Aleksandar Nikolic +9 · PfE
… below the qualifying threshold, meaning soybean was not classified as high ILUC-risk; Añadido: whereas soy cultivated in the European Union therefore does not generate negative landuse change impacts and is produced in compliance with stringent Union environmental, climate and biodiversity standards, contributing to diversified rotations, soil fertility and improved resilience of farming systems;
Recital G a (new)
Presentada por Paolo Borchia, Raffaele Stancanelli, Aleksandar Nikolic +9 · PfE
Añadido: Ga. whereas the unilateral shift of the observation period from 2008 to 2014 illustrates a broader pattern in which the Commission uses its delegated powers under Article 290 TFEU to introduce substantive policy changes with significant economic impact across the agri-food and biofuel value chains, rather than limiting itself to the technical, non-essential adjustments for which such delegation is intended; whereas, more generally, recourse to delegated acts should be discouraged and, in any case, strictly defined in the basic act, as the procedure does not provide the same level of democratic scrutiny as the ordinary legislative procedure, thereby leaving matters of significant economic and political importance solely in the hands of the Commission;
Recital M a (new)
Presentada por Paolo Borchia, Raffaele Stancanelli, Aleksandar Nikolic +9 · PfE
Añadido: Ma. whereas first generation biofuels plays and will continue to play an important role in the transport sector, and this contribution should be duly recognised rather than being constrained by generic limitations introduced as an indirect way to address ILUC concerns; whereas the proposed Delegated Regulation risks contradicting the strategic objectives of developing an European biofuel value chains, as well as the protection of consumers from unnecessary increases in food and energy prices, particularly in highly exposed Member States;
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Presentada por Paolo Borchia, Raffaele Stancanelli, Aleksandar Nikolic +9 · PfE
Añadido: 1a. Considers that the methodology used by the Commission relies excessively on theoretical and globally aggregated models that do not adequately reflect the actual environmental performance of soy production in different production systems and regions, and that it does not sufficiently account for the specific characteristics of European soy cultivation and for the structural protein dependence of Member States; warns that the current proposal would generate severe economic consequences for the European agrifood sector, in particular for livestock, feed and biofuel supply chains, by increasing uncertainty over soy availability, raising feed and production costs, as well as the cost of sustainable fuels;
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Presentada por Paolo Borchia, Raffaele Stancanelli, Aleksandar Nikolic +9 · PfE
Añadido: 1b. Stresses that soy cultivated within the European Union should, by definition, be considered a low ILUCrisk feedstock, in light of the absence of deforestation impacts; emphasises, once again, that Union policies must avoid creating unjustified additional competitive disadvantages for the Union operators and carefully distinguish between feedstocks and uses so as not to undermine protein autonomy and the stability of the agrifood sector in Member States;
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Presentada por Paolo Borchia, Raffaele Stancanelli, Aleksandar Nikolic +9 · PfE
Añadido: 1c. Emphasises that, pursuant to Article 290 TFEU, delegated acts may only supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of a legislative act; considers that amendments to feedstock classification criteria entailing an estimated economic impact exceeding EUR 1.4 billion across the value chain are liable to affect essential policy choices and therefore raise serious questions as to whether they may appropriately be regarded as relating solely to non-essential elements; stresses that any such amendments should be accompanied by a comprehensive impact assessment, especially of the economic consequences; accordingly, calls for limiting the conferral of delegated powers on the Commission, particularly where such delegation is defined in overly broad and general terms, as this entails the risk of transferring to the Commission decisions with significant economic and political impact that should instead remain within the remit of the co-legislators;
Paragraph 3
Presentada por Paolo Borchia, Raffaele Stancanelli, Aleksandar Nikolic +9 · PfE
… Calls on the Commission to submit a revised delegated act without delay, Añadido: following an appropriate impact assessment and consultation with Member States and stakeholders, which takes account of the following recommendations:
Voto por grupo político
Cómo votaron los grupos políticos
- 14A favor
- 40En contra
- 19Abstención
- 5No votó
- 159A favor
- 14En contra
- 0Abstención
- 12No votó
- 78A favor
- 0En contra
- 0Abstención
- 6No votó
- 27A favor
- 94En contra
- 2Abstención
- 12No votó
- 72A favor
- 0En contra
- 0Abstención
- 13No votó
- 24A favor
- 0En contra
- 1Abstención
- 2No votó
- 14A favor
- 12En contra
- 0Abstención
- 1No votó
- 0A favor
- 40En contra
- 1Abstención
- 4No votó
- 0A favor
- 48En contra
- 1Abstención
- 4No votó
Miembros
Mostrando 10 de 719
| Nombre | País | Grupo | Posición de voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor |