Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Actividades financieras del Grupo del Banco Europeo de Inversiones: informe anual 2025

Joachim Streit - Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 07.07.2026·Referencia: A10-0170/2026
Ponente: Joachim Streit

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 316 A favor
  • 281 En contra
  • 39 Abstención
  • 83 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 155 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2025/2213(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión120 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión90 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno155 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (16)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  4. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  5. Presentación al pleno
  6. Presentación al pleno
  7. Presentación al pleno
  8. Presentación al pleno
  9. Presentación al pleno
  10. Presentación al pleno
  11. Presentación al pleno
  12. Presentación al pleno
  13. Presentación al pleno
  14. Debate en el pleno
  15. Votación en el pleno
  16. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Debate en el pleno
  2. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Inversiones récord de 100 mil millones de euros del BEI en 2025.
  • Enfoque en el papel de banco climático con más del 50 % de inversiones para transición verde.
  • Fortalecimiento de la competitividad y la innovación como prioridades clave.
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (13)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 1Aprobada

    Paragraph 25 a (new)

    Presentada por Anouk Van Brug · Renew

    Añadido: 25a. Calls on the Member States to amend the EIB’s exclusion list in order to enable the financing of weapons and ammunition beyond mere dual-use technologies, thereby contributing to the development of the European defence industry;

  2. Enmienda 3Rechazada

    Paragraph -1 (new)

    Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left

    Añadido: -1. Takes the view that the European Investment Bank’s primary objectives should be the promotion of economic, social and territorial cohesion, and that its funding should be directed, as a matter of priority, towards public investment and projects that meet the needs of the people and the development priorities laid down by each Member State, including support for the productive economy, micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, the promotion of full employment and the creation of jobs with rights, the strengthening and modernisation of public services – particularly in the health, education and transport sectors – support for and promotion of social facilities such as creches, care homes and support infrastructure for people with disabilities, public housing, as well as the promotion of Member States’ energy sovereignty; takes the view, to that end, that the EIB’s activities must not be subordinated to the logic of so-called ‘competitiveness’ and the transfer and concentration of resources towards economic conglomerates, nor must they be diverted towards the financing of militarisation;

  3. Enmienda 3Rechazada

    Paragraph -1 (new)

    Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left

    Añadido: -1. Takes the view that the European Investment Bank’s primary objectives should be the promotion of economic, social and territorial cohesion, and that its funding should be directed, as a matter of priority, towards public investment and projects that meet the needs of the people and the development priorities laid down by each Member State, including support for the productive economy, micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, the promotion of full employment and the creation of jobs with rights, the strengthening and modernisation of public services – particularly in the health, education and transport sectors – support for and promotion of social facilities such as creches, care homes and support infrastructure for people with disabilities, public housing, as well as the promotion of Member States’ energy sovereignty; takes the view, to that end, that the EIB’s activities must not be subordinated to the logic of so-called ‘competitiveness’ and the transfer and concentration of resources towards economic conglomerates, nor must they be diverted towards the financing of militarisation;

  4. Enmienda 4Rechazada

    Paragraph 8

    Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left

    8. Calls Añadido: on the Commission to urgently present, by 31 August 2028, a proposal to extend the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) implementation period so the full amount of its funding can be used; calls on the EIB to play an active role in supporting the continuity and completion of projects Eliminado: initiated under the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), safeguarding the objectives beyond the cut-off date; Añadido: beyond the new cut-off date should it prove necessary after the extension; underlines that EIB financing and technical assistance can provide Eliminado: a critical Añadido: an additional bridge to ensure that RRF-funded projects deliver their intended economic and social …

  5. Enmienda 5Rechazada

    Paragraph 19 a (new)

    Presentada por João Oliveira, Marc Botenga · The Left

    Añadido: 19a. Rules out the use of EIB resources for the funding and promotion of militarisation; takes the view that these resources should be put towards meeting the economic and social needs of the people, in particular addressing the rising cost of living and helping uphold the right to decent, sustainable and affordable housing for all;

  6. Enmienda 6Aprobada

    Paragraph 12

    Presentada por Bogdan Rzońca, Ruggero Razza, Dick Erixon · ECR

    … have a clear potential to enhance market competitiveness and European strategic autonomy; Añadido: calls on the EIB to apply technology-neutral evaluation criteria, such as life-cycle carbon intensity and grid stability, when financing low-carbon energy projects, including nuclear energy, while fully respecting the sovereign right of each Member State to determine its own energy mix;

  7. Enmienda 7Rechazada

    Paragraph 13 a (new)

    Presentada por Bogdan Rzońca, Ruggero Razza, Dick Erixon · ECR

    Añadido: 13a. Is concerned that the EIB’s signed financing commitments to Northvolt AB, totalling around EUR 942.6 million, of which around EUR 288 million (USD 313 million) was still outstanding at the time of its bankruptcy filing in Sweden on 12 March 2025, together with the risks observed in comparable large-scale ventures, point to weaknesses in the appraisal of projects that scale up unproven technologies; calls on the EIB to disclose the lessons learnt, to strengthen its due diligence for such projects, and to evaluate and report systematically on late payments and beneficiary insolvencies across its portfolio, as a matter of sound financial management and value for money for taxpayers; stresses that the presence of other publicly-backed or EU-supported investors in a project must not be treated as a substitute for the EIB’s own independent due diligence and risk assessment;

  8. Enmienda 8Aprobada

    Paragraph 15

    Presentada por Bogdan Rzońca, Ruggero Razza, Dick Erixon · ECR

    … ensure the effective use of resources and the crowding-in of private investment; Añadido: expresses concern that disproportionate environmental, social and governance reporting requirements imposed on beneficiaries deter economically viable projects and place European businesses at a competitive disadvantage, and calls on the EIB to review these requirements to ensure proportionality;

  9. Enmienda 9Rechazada

    Paragraph 21

    Presentada por Bogdan Rzońca, Ruggero Razza, Dick Erixon · ECR

    … industry, as stated in the European Council conclusions of 6 March 2025; Añadido: calls on the EIB to remove the remaining restrictions on defence and security financing so that all project types are eligible, and to eliminate administrative barriers that impede investment in defence and external border protection;

  10. Enmienda 10Aprobada

    Paragraph 25 a (new)

    Presentada por Bogdan Rzońca, Ruggero Razza, Dick Erixon · ECR

    Añadido: 25a. Stresses that the EIB’s lending in non-EU countries should reinforce the EU’s external priorities; calls on the EIB to include effective cooperation by partner countries on migration management, including the readmission and return of migrants who have no legal right to stay in the EU, as a relevant criterion within its external lending framework for non-EU countries;

  11. Enmienda 11Rechazada

    Paragraph 5 a (new)

    Presentada por Sarah Knafo, Marcin Sypniewski, Stanisław Tyszka +1 · ESN

    Añadido: 5a. Stresses that the EIB must operate strictly as a complementary instrument of last resort, intervening only where genuine market failures exist and where private capital cannot be mobilised on its own; warns against any expansion of the EIB’s mandate or financing volumes that would crowd out private investment or be a substitute for Member States’ own investment decisions;

  12. Enmienda 12Rechazada

    Paragraph 6 a (new)

    Presentada por Sarah Knafo, Marcin Sypniewski, Stanisław Tyszka +1 · ESN

    Añadido: 6a. Warns against the use of the EIB and EIB-backed instruments as a mechanism for de facto budgetary mutualisation or for financing EU own resources outside the normal budgetary procedure; stresses that any reinforcement of the EIB’s role under the next multiannual financial framework must be subject to full parliamentary scrutiny;

  13. Enmienda 13Rechazada

    Paragraph 21 a (new)

    Presentada por Sarah Knafo, Marcin Sypniewski, Stanisław Tyszka +1 · ESN

    Añadido: 21a. Stresses that EIB financing in the defence and security sector must fully respect Member States’ sovereignty over their defence procurement decisions and national defence industrial strategies; considers that EIB support for defence must prioritise the reinforcement of European industrial sovereignty, the reduction of strategic dependencies and the strengthening of national defence industrial bases;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
FranciaRenew
A favor
ItaliaECR
A favor
RumaníaRenew
A favor
EspañaEPP
A favor
LetoniaEPP
A favor
ItaliaECR
A favor
FranciaEPP
A favor
CroaciaEPP
A favor
IrlandaEPP
A favor
SueciaRenew
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en